Skip to content

Conversation

@lpatiny
Copy link
Member

@lpatiny lpatiny commented Nov 12, 2025

No description provided.

@cloudflare-workers-and-pages
Copy link

cloudflare-workers-and-pages bot commented Nov 12, 2025

Deploying openchemlib-js with  Cloudflare Pages  Cloudflare Pages

Latest commit: 9b40e0e
Status: ✅  Deploy successful!
Preview URL: https://64331d85.openchemlib-js.pages.dev
Branch Preview URL: https://fantomproduct.openchemlib-js.pages.dev

View logs

@lpatiny
Copy link
Member Author

lpatiny commented Nov 12, 2025

@targos I didn't succeed to update openchemlib in this project. Before I fill a bug report could you try to update this branch to the last version of OCL ?

I did npm run copy-openchemlib

But then the build yields to an error

npm run build-java

> [email protected] build-java
> npm run build-java-min && npm run build-java-debug


> [email protected] build-java-min
> node scripts/build.js build --mode=min

node:internal/errors:985
  const err = new Error(message);
              ^

Error: Command failed: java -Xmx2G -cp src:/Users/lpatiny/gwt/gwt-2.12.1/gwt-dev.jar:/Users/lpatiny/gwt/gwt-2.12.1/gwt-user.jar com.google.gwt.dev.Compiler com.actelion.research.gwt.Js -logLevel ERROR -XnocheckCasts -XnoclassMetadata -nodraftCompile -nocheckAssertions -generateJsInteropExports -optimize 9 -style OBFUSCATED -sourceLevel 17 -failOnError
    at genericNodeError (node:internal/errors:985:15)
    at wrappedFn (node:internal/errors:539:14)
    at checkExecSyncError (node:child_process:925:11)
    at Object.execFileSync (node:child_process:961:15)
    at compile (file:///Users/lpatiny/git/cheminfo/openchemlib-js/scripts/build.js:184:27)
    at run (file:///Users/lpatiny/git/cheminfo/openchemlib-js/scripts/build.js:75:5)
    at file:///Users/lpatiny/git/cheminfo/openchemlib-js/scripts/build.js:65:1 {
  status: 1,
  signal: null,
  output: [
    null,
    Buffer(544) [Uint8Array] [
       67, 111, 109, 112, 105, 108, 105, 110, 103,  32, 109, 111,
      100, 117, 108, 101,  32,  99, 111, 109,  46,  97,  99, 116,
      101, 108, 105, 111, 110,  46, 114, 101, 115, 101,  97, 114,
       99, 104,  46, 103, 119, 116,  46,  74, 115,  10,  32,  32,
       32,  84, 114,  97,  99, 105, 110, 103,  32,  99, 111, 109,
      112, 105, 108, 101,  32, 102,  97, 105, 108, 117, 114, 101,
       32, 112,  97, 116, 104,  32, 102, 111, 114,  32, 116, 121,
      112, 101,  32,  39,  99, 111, 109,  46,  97,  99, 116, 101,
      108, 105, 111, 110,
      ... 444 more items
    ],
    Buffer(0) [Uint8Array] []
  ],
  pid: 64173,
  stdout: Buffer(544) [Uint8Array] [
     67, 111, 109, 112, 105, 108, 105, 110, 103,  32, 109, 111,
    100, 117, 108, 101,  32,  99, 111, 109,  46,  97,  99, 116,
    101, 108, 105, 111, 110,  46, 114, 101, 115, 101,  97, 114,
     99, 104,  46, 103, 119, 116,  46,  74, 115,  10,  32,  32,
     32,  84, 114,  97,  99, 105, 110, 103,  32,  99, 111, 109,
    112, 105, 108, 101,  32, 102,  97, 105, 108, 117, 114, 101,
     32, 112,  97, 116, 104,  32, 102, 111, 114,  32, 116, 121,
    112, 101,  32,  39,  99, 111, 109,  46,  97,  99, 116, 101,
    108, 105, 111, 110,
    ... 444 more items
  ],
  stderr: Buffer(0) [Uint8Array] []

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Nov 12, 2025

In this PR your are reverting the submodule back to an old commit. Here on main we are tracking https://github.com/cheminfo/openchemlib/tree/68a858e6e08e2fdf5f6ce856bc9562ebf34cf26f. This PR sets it to https://github.com/cheminfo/openchemlib/tree/c8b24f7a48bcc6e5bebcba9df16c1b64bfedcb48

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Nov 12, 2025

Only the PDB parser changed in the actelion repo since the last update. I can update it but don't expect any changes to the reactions.

@lpatiny
Copy link
Member Author

lpatiny commented Nov 12, 2025

Ok no need to update then. Thanks.

@lpatiny
Copy link
Member Author

lpatiny commented Nov 12, 2025

@targos
Copy link
Member

targos commented Nov 25, 2025

I guess this was replaced by #353

@targos targos closed this Nov 25, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants