Skip to content

Generic Container with support for TargetResolver #268

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 19, 2025
Merged

Conversation

bradfol
Copy link
Collaborator

@bradfol bradfol commented Mar 17, 2025

No description provided.

@bradfol bradfol requested a review from skorulis-ap March 17, 2025 22:15
@bradfol bradfol force-pushed the bradfol/specified branch from f70c01c to d086208 Compare March 18, 2025 16:31
@bradfol bradfol changed the title Specified Container Generic Container with support for TargetResolver Mar 18, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will WeakResolver still be needed going forwards? We might be able to remove this in a later PR.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yep that's one of my follow up items. It should no longer be needed

@bradfol bradfol force-pushed the bradfol/specified branch 2 times, most recently from 4e0b2ae to 7d12123 Compare March 18, 2025 22:04
@bradfol bradfol marked this pull request as ready for review March 18, 2025 23:09
bradfol added 2 commits March 18, 2025 16:58
When using a single ModuleAssembler it can be useful for it to ignore TargetResolvers for its assemblies.

The app target use case is an app that only has a single TargetResolver, often `Knit.Resolver`.

The test target use case is when a single ModuleAssembler is used for multiple TargetResolvers for simplicity of test setup.
@bradfol bradfol force-pushed the bradfol/specified branch from 7d12123 to 3956ba8 Compare March 18, 2025 23:59
@bradfol bradfol merged commit 47e4285 into main Mar 19, 2025
2 checks passed
@bradfol bradfol deleted the bradfol/specified branch March 19, 2025 00:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants