-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 87
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove test results from documentation #1832
Conversation
ec7c01b
to
83abf34
Compare
Transaction cost differencesScript summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Commit
transaction costs
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
54 | - | - | - | - |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - | - |
4 | - | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - | - |
6 | - | - | - | - | - |
7 | - | - | - | - | - |
8 | - | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | +0.39 | +0.09 | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | +0.39 | +0.09 | +0.01 |
37 | - | - | - | - |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
40 | - | - | - | - |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
34 | - | - | - | - |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | - | - | - | - |
2 | - | - | - | - |
3 | - | - | - | - |
5 | - | - | - | - |
10 | - | - | - | - |
27 | - | - | - | - |
FanOut
transaction costs
UTxO, Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
(0, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(1, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(5, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(10, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(20, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
(37, 10) | - | - | - | - | - |
Transaction costsSizes and execution budgets for Hydra protocol transactions. Note that unlisted parameters are currently using
Script summary
|
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 6094 | 10.80 | 3.35 | 0.53 |
2 | 6294 | 13.13 | 4.07 | 0.56 |
3 | 6493 | 15.28 | 4.73 | 0.59 |
5 | 6897 | 19.76 | 6.10 | 0.66 |
10 | 7903 | 31.18 | 9.61 | 0.82 |
40 | 13936 | 98.61 | 30.29 | 1.78 |
Commit
transaction costs
This uses ada-only outputs for better comparability.
UTxO | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 561 | 2.44 | 1.16 | 0.20 |
2 | 742 | 3.38 | 1.73 | 0.22 |
3 | 923 | 4.36 | 2.33 | 0.24 |
5 | 1276 | 6.41 | 3.60 | 0.28 |
10 | 2173 | 12.13 | 7.25 | 0.40 |
54 | 10068 | 98.61 | 68.52 | 1.88 |
CollectCom
transaction costs
Parties | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 57 | 525 | 26.47 | 7.60 | 0.44 |
2 | 114 | 636 | 36.05 | 10.28 | 0.54 |
3 | 171 | 747 | 42.10 | 12.12 | 0.61 |
4 | 225 | 858 | 53.79 | 15.31 | 0.73 |
5 | 283 | 969 | 64.07 | 18.11 | 0.84 |
6 | 337 | 1081 | 75.25 | 21.20 | 0.96 |
7 | 392 | 1192 | 88.18 | 24.72 | 1.09 |
8 | 449 | 1303 | 99.68 | 27.86 | 1.21 |
9 | 504 | 1418 | 95.86 | 27.41 | 1.18 |
Cost of Increment Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 1802 | 25.11 | 8.24 | 0.49 |
2 | 1932 | 26.73 | 9.40 | 0.52 |
3 | 2059 | 28.34 | 10.57 | 0.55 |
5 | 2366 | 33.02 | 13.38 | 0.62 |
10 | 3225 | 44.60 | 20.56 | 0.80 |
38 | 7441 | 98.60 | 56.65 | 1.68 |
Cost of Decrement Transaction
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 598 | 23.99 | 7.61 | 0.43 |
2 | 757 | 25.35 | 8.66 | 0.45 |
3 | 877 | 26.53 | 9.62 | 0.47 |
5 | 1244 | 33.00 | 12.75 | 0.56 |
10 | 1941 | 39.95 | 17.99 | 0.69 |
39 | 6453 | 99.87 | 53.85 | 1.63 |
Close
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 651 | 30.95 | 9.67 | 0.50 |
2 | 791 | 32.80 | 10.91 | 0.53 |
3 | 1011 | 36.12 | 12.77 | 0.58 |
5 | 1164 | 35.78 | 13.80 | 0.59 |
10 | 1909 | 46.10 | 20.48 | 0.75 |
34 | 5644 | 96.57 | 52.97 | 1.56 |
Contest
transaction costs
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 681 | 35.95 | 11.00 | 0.55 |
2 | 832 | 38.19 | 12.34 | 0.58 |
3 | 991 | 41.07 | 13.96 | 0.63 |
5 | 1268 | 45.21 | 16.54 | 0.69 |
10 | 2030 | 58.10 | 24.01 | 0.88 |
28 | 4617 | 99.50 | 48.80 | 1.51 |
Abort
transaction costs
There is some variation due to the random mixture of initial and already committed outputs.
Parties | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 5981 | 28.23 | 9.31 | 0.71 |
2 | 6050 | 36.46 | 11.98 | 0.80 |
3 | 6208 | 44.55 | 14.69 | 0.89 |
4 | 6461 | 58.74 | 19.43 | 1.05 |
5 | 6505 | 66.09 | 21.81 | 1.13 |
6 | 6690 | 77.11 | 25.47 | 1.25 |
7 | 6746 | 83.17 | 27.43 | 1.32 |
8 | 6874 | 92.87 | 30.60 | 1.42 |
FanOut
transaction costs
Involves spending head output and burning head tokens. Uses ada-only UTXO for better comparability.
Parties | UTxO | UTxO (bytes) | Tx size | % max Mem | % max CPU | Min fee ₳ |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
10 | 5 | 285 | 6262 | 30.77 | 10.75 | 0.75 |
10 | 10 | 568 | 6429 | 40.50 | 14.57 | 0.87 |
10 | 20 | 1138 | 6769 | 61.80 | 22.83 | 1.11 |
10 | 30 | 1708 | 7112 | 82.65 | 30.94 | 1.35 |
10 | 37 | 2102 | 7345 | 98.94 | 37.19 | 1.54 |
End-to-end benchmark results
This page is intended to collect the latest end-to-end benchmark results produced by Hydra's continuous integration (CI) system from the latest master
code.
Please note that these results are approximate as they are currently produced from limited cloud VMs and not controlled hardware. Rather than focusing on the absolute results, the emphasis should be on relative results, such as how the timings for a scenario evolve as the code changes.
Generated at 2025-02-07 17:01:07.656383797 UTC
Baseline Scenario
Number of nodes | 1 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 300 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 4.248785430 |
P99 | 8.115718979999983ms |
P95 | 5.098932800000001ms |
P50 | 4.078221ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
| Memory data |
2025-02-07 16:59:42.858580091 UTC
Used: 946M, Free: 5909M
2025-02-07 16:59:47.858562803 UTC
Used: 1047M, Free: 5715M
2025-02-07 16:59:52.858496969 UTC
Used: 1050M, Free: 5711M
2025-02-07 16:59:57.858522684 UTC
Used: 1056M, Free: 5705M
2025-02-07 17:00:02.858587701 UTC
Used: 1057M, Free: 5703M
2025-02-07 17:00:07.858577347 UTC
Used: 1060M, Free: 5700M
Three local nodes
Number of nodes | 3 |
---|---|
Number of txs | 900 |
Avg. Confirmation Time (ms) | 22.901154015 |
P99 | 117.25396187ms |
P95 | 30.04532545ms |
P50 | 20.22898ms |
Number of Invalid txs | 0 |
| Memory data |
2025-02-07 17:00:20.683669889 UTC
Used: 969M, Free: 5803M
2025-02-07 17:00:25.683845221 UTC
Used: 1162M, Free: 5609M
2025-02-07 17:00:30.683825033 UTC
Used: 1171M, Free: 5599M
2025-02-07 17:00:35.683716088 UTC
Used: 1177M, Free: 5591M
2025-02-07 17:00:40.683957021 UTC
Used: 1224M, Free: 5470M
2025-02-07 17:00:45.68375046 UTC
Used: 1243M, Free: 5379M
2025-02-07 17:00:50.683733482 UTC
Used: 1257M, Free: 5364M
2025-02-07 17:00:55.683718204 UTC
Used: 1265M, Free: 5355M
2025-02-07 17:01:00.683755749 UTC
Used: 1263M, Free: 5356M
2025-02-07 17:01:05.683781633 UTC
Used: 1263M, Free: 5355M
631b2ff
to
0135d93
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
0135d93
to
d260d3f
Compare
I'll update the right |
No description provided.