Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Drop custom tigera operator patches #3

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 6, 2024

Conversation

petrutlucian94
Copy link
Contributor

@petrutlucian94 petrutlucian94 commented Dec 5, 2024

The Tigera operator expects the ImageSet specs to contain the original image names, not the custom ones. We'll drop our custom patches and update the integration tests accordingly.

We need to remove "calico-ctl" from the image spec as the Tigera operator does not expect it and is going to throw an error.

While at it, we'll avoid using the "match" expression since it's unsupported on 22.04.

@petrutlucian94 petrutlucian94 marked this pull request as draft December 5, 2024 14:08
The Tigera operator expects the ImageSet specs to contain the original
image names, not the custom ones. We'll drop our custom patches and
update the integration tests accordingly.

We need to remove "calico-ctl" from the image spec as the Tigera
operator does not expect it and is going to throw an error.

While at it, we'll avoid using the "match" expression since it's
unsupported on 22.04.
@petrutlucian94 petrutlucian94 force-pushed the lpetrut/drop_custom_patches branch from 93997df to edb1385 Compare December 6, 2024 08:16
@petrutlucian94 petrutlucian94 marked this pull request as ready for review December 6, 2024 08:36
@petrutlucian94
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've opened an upstream PR to improve the ImageSet documentation: tigera/operator#3635

Copy link
Collaborator

@bschimke95 bschimke95 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@bschimke95 bschimke95 merged commit 4122057 into main Dec 6, 2024
28 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants