-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 186
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs(self-managed): update OpenShift routes instructions #3997
Conversation
👋 🤖 ✅ Looks like the changes were ported across versions, nice job! 🎉 You can read more about the versioning within our docs in our documentation guidelines. |
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
The connector changes are only being added to 8.5 since within 8.6, zeebe gateway will have full support for rest. I will then open another PR to recommend the customer to use rest in zeebe gateway when openshift routes are configured. I can only create that PR once I have tested 8.6 zeebe. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm, I'll try the setup instructions later
good work, wp :)
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||
```bash | ||
#grab OpenShift generated tls crt | ||
kubectl get secret -n camunda camunda-zeebe-gateway -o jsonpath="{.data['tls\.crt']}" | base64 --decode > tls.crt |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
As discussed in https://github.com/camunda/distribution/issues/254#issuecomment-2196227345, could we integrate this directly at the startup of the container?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@conceptualshark We continued our discussion and noticed that instead we should put a reference to a github issue in the docs: camunda/connectors#2806
Is it a good idea to put a link to a github issue in the docs or should I just mention that we are working on a fix that will not require this manual workaround and not add a link?
For now I will add a link and you can remove it if you think it's not appropriate.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
added link to github issue ✅
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this reference is fine - we can make a note to remove it once the issue is closed.
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@conceptualshark Please wait for @aabouzaid to approve the PR before you start your review. Thanks. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I checked both the content and the rendering, looks good!
nice work @hamza-m-masood 🚀
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Is there anything in this PR that should be ported to 8.6 ( |
@akeller No change in the content, so Hamza will copy the same content to other versions once all reviewers are done. |
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ If you deploy Camunda 8 (and related infrastructure) with permissive SCCs out of | |||
|
|||
## Ingress Configuration | |||
|
|||
Before exposing services outside the cluster, we need an ingress component. Here's how you can configure it: | |||
Before exposing services outside the cluster, we need an Ingress component. Here's how you can configure it: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think we're consistent with ingress/Ingress casing across our docs. @conceptualshark WDYT? Do you think this warrants an issue for the backlog? Would you like to take a look at this across the SM docs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍 I can spin something off to go through this. I think the capitalization does a lot of work here.
versioned_docs/version-8.5/self-managed/setup/deploy/openshift/redhat-openshift.md
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, thank you 👍
@conceptualshark I am ready for your review. Thanks for waiting. |
@hamza-m-masood I'm curious whether there's anything in place that regularly tests what's described in the docs? |
awesome, great to see! |
@hamza-m-masood Ready to merge here, or waiting on additional review? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I made a few formatting adjustments that should hopefully improve readability, and updated a few lines. If these changes work for you, this is good to go from me, so I'm preemptively approving. 👍
@conceptualshark I'm happy with the changes you made. Looks great! |
Description
Related issue: https://github.com/camunda/distribution/issues/253
This PR updates the OpenShift routes page for 8.5.
When should this change go live?
hold
label or convert to draft PR)PR Checklist
/versioned_docs
directory./docs
directory (aka/next/
).