Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Multiple cdroms #718

Open
rkearsley opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 5 comments
Open

Multiple cdroms #718

rkearsley opened this issue Nov 14, 2023 · 5 comments
Labels
acknowledged ✨ enhancement New feature or request
Milestone

Comments

@rkearsley
Copy link

When creating a vm (e.g. a windows vm), we specify the windows iso file and also the virtio drivers iso in multiple "cdrom" blocks - ide0 and ide2
Unfortunately this seems not supported in bpg/proxmox, failing with Error: Too many cdrom blocks / No more than 1 "cdrom" blocks are allowed

It would be nice to allow multiple cdrom blocks to be defined as it is supported by proxmox UI to have two cdroms attached to a single vm

Workaround is currently to add the second iso manually in the proxmox web interface

@rkearsley rkearsley added the ✨ enhancement New feature or request label Nov 14, 2023
@brutesque
Copy link

I just ran into the same issue. This would be a nice feature.

@curio-scripter
Copy link

This would be great to have, would definitely use this tf resource if it was possible.

@ychlc
Copy link

ychlc commented May 30, 2024

+1 for this, especially when creating windows VMs as mentioned.

@bpg
Copy link
Owner

bpg commented Jun 1, 2024

There are few limitations in the current code that make it harder to implement, particularly the update and clone operations.
Will be done as part of the "new VM resource" in #1231.

@bpg-autobot
Copy link
Contributor

bpg-autobot bot commented Nov 29, 2024

Marking this issue as stale due to inactivity in the past 180 days. This helps us focus on the active issues. If this issue is reproducible with the latest version of the provider, please comment. If this issue receives no comments in the next 30 days it will automatically be closed. If this issue was automatically closed and you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
acknowledged ✨ enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: ⛔️ Blocked
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants