-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 901
[PM-27834] Use Authenticator Bridge as a project reference #5793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
|
Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5793 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.90% 84.90%
=======================================
Files 724 724
Lines 52780 52780
Branches 7672 7672
=======================================
Hits 44811 44811
Misses 5277 5277
Partials 2692 2692 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
765040b to
afa24de
Compare
|
Claude finished @vvolkgang's task —— View job PR Review Complete ✅Todo List
SummaryThis PR successfully replaces the precompiled Authenticator Bridge AAR library (v1.0.1) with a project reference in both the Changes ReviewModified Files:
Assessment✅ Strengths:
📝 Observations:
Architecture ComplianceThis change aligns with the project's modular architecture as documented in the codebase:
RecommendationApprove ✅ - This is a solid refactoring that improves the development workflow without introducing any risks. The change is well-tested through CI, and the approach is consistent with how other internal modules are consumed in the project. |

🎟️ Tracking
PM-27834
📔 Objective
Use Authenticator Bridge as a project reference instead of the compiled binary.
📸 Screenshots
⏰ Reminders before review
🦮 Reviewer guidelines
:+1:) or similar for great changes:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info:question:) for questions:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion:art:) for suggestions / improvements:x:) or:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes