Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Projection mode changer #73
Projection mode changer #73
Changes from 6 commits
c2a24dd
e28606f
ec713cd
b39780d
2d72754
d19a88d
df97e5d
4ada17d
cdc40b4
b5e6efb
3c4b5b5
5056954
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could fail because a
Source
can have different converters and thus exists in different flavors. One Source -> 2 SourceAndConverters, one with a gray LUT and one with a completely different LUT, for instance.We have to think about that, but that's a major issue. I had to deal with this in the remove(SourceAndConverter, BdvHandle) function from the display service, you should have a look at it and then let's rediscuss this. Maybe there's no better way...
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed! See conversations below.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
cf comment above, maybe change this to int to fasten the computation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok. I could do this, but long term I think an enum would be the cleanest.
The only reason I was choosing String constants was because this is the only thing that works in
Command
choices. Thus, usingint
s not would make it more complicated because we have to implement the constants twice.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I'll investigate the performance and report back