Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677) #680

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

iwannay
Copy link

@iwannay iwannay commented Dec 24, 2020

Support for asynchronous transfer like Nginx, which can be transmitted to the opposite side after the broker layer fully receives the data

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Dec 24, 2020

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission! We really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@codecov-io
Copy link

codecov-io commented Dec 24, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #680 (b844255) into develop (e76d8a3) will increase coverage by 0.14%.
The diff coverage is 62.93%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop     #680      +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage    52.21%   52.36%   +0.14%     
===========================================
  Files          288      289       +1     
  Lines        22355    22587     +232     
===========================================
+ Hits         11673    11828     +155     
- Misses        9084     9147      +63     
- Partials      1598     1612      +14     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
bfe_server/proxy_state.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
bfe_server/reverseproxy.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
bfe_util/multibuf/buffer.go 78.04% <78.04%> (ø)
...bfe_cluster_conf/cluster_conf/cluster_conf_load.go 56.42% <100.00%> (+3.92%) ⬆️
bfe_spdy/frame_write.go 46.32% <0.00%> (+1.12%) ⬆️
bfe_spdy/server_write_sched.go 77.47% <0.00%> (+1.80%) ⬆️
bfe_websocket/server_conn.go 74.59% <0.00%> (+4.09%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update e76d8a3...b844255. Read the comment docs.

@iwannay iwannay changed the title support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677) support for broker layer asynchronous transports #677 Dec 24, 2020
@iwannay iwannay changed the title support for broker layer asynchronous transports #677 support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677) Dec 24, 2020
@iwannay iwannay changed the title support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677) support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677 ) Dec 24, 2020
@iwannay iwannay changed the title support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677 ) support for broker layer asynchronous transports (#677) Dec 24, 2020
@iwannay
Copy link
Author

iwannay commented Dec 24, 2020

#677

@iwannay
Copy link
Author

iwannay commented Dec 24, 2020

my package is organized a little bit differently than the BFE, in the BFE different types of packages are enclosed in parentheses but mine are not, and that might be a problem 😂

@iyangsj iyangsj closed this Oct 4, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants