Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

👷 Add Slither analysis workflow #13

Closed
wants to merge 28 commits into from

Conversation

Aboudjem
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 20, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (dd34a2e) 100.00% compared to head (3c9060a) 100.00%.

❗ Current head 3c9060a differs from pull request most recent head 6240c57. Consider uploading reports for the commit 6240c57 to get more accurate results

Additional details and impacted files
@@                    Coverage Diff                     @@
##           feat/erc-7579-interfaces       #13   +/-   ##
==========================================================
  Coverage                    100.00%   100.00%           
==========================================================
  Files                             6         6           
  Lines                            42        42           
==========================================================
  Hits                             42        42           
Flag Coverage Δ
foundry 100.00% <ø> (ø)
hardhat 100.00% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@filmakarov
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks like one check is failing for this branch @Aboudjem

Slither Analysis / analyze (push) Failing after 1m

@Aboudjem Aboudjem closed this Feb 20, 2024
@Aboudjem Aboudjem deleted the feat/slither branch February 20, 2024 17:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants