Skip to content

Issues: bazelbuild/rules_proto

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

21 Open 75 Closed
21 Open 75 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Allow to specify --protocopt on per-target basis
#230 opened Dec 15, 2024 by auzhva
[Bazel CI] ERROR migrate to bzlmod
#224 opened Sep 2, 2024 by sgowroji
[Bazel CI] Generating proto for Starlark doc for defs failed:
#223 opened Aug 1, 2024 by sgowroji
2
proto_common.compile breaks non-.exe Windows plugins P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#220 opened Jul 3, 2024 by iamricard
rules_cc dependency marked as dev causes rules_cc module visibility issues bug Something isn't working P1 I'll work on this now. (Assignee required)
#203 opened Feb 8, 2024 by steeve
1
@thesayyn
5
build error when a.proto import b.proto, and the protos under same dir documentation Improvements or additions to documentation P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#198 opened Jan 8, 2024 by sky92zwq
2
symbol not found in flat namespace on apple M1 bug Something isn't working P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#175 opened Jun 19, 2023 by slai-nick
1
Ensure Maven imports are tagged with maven_coordinates bug Something isn't working P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#169 opened Mar 9, 2023 by SanjayVas
Cannot open include file: 'google/protobuf/text_format.h': No such file or directory P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#133 opened Aug 6, 2022 by ZichaoNickFox
1
generate a wrong platform protoc.exe when cross compile P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#126 opened Jun 24, 2022 by xiedeacc
9
Add a rule for encoding textprotos P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#122 opened Jun 4, 2022 by davidgiven
1
protoc: argument list too long help wanted Extra attention is needed P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#120 opened May 16, 2022 by mohitkriplani1998
4
[Feature request] Allow users to recompile protoc P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#115 opened Mar 22, 2022 by googleson78
6
How to set --fatal_warnings? P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee) question Further information is requested
#96 opened Aug 24, 2021 by Kernald
3
Google Endpoint descriptor file error P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#93 opened Jul 15, 2021 by markabdallah
1
Extract protobuf_workspace to a separate repository P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#76 opened Nov 20, 2020 by simuons
Need ability to specify other versions of protoc P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#73 opened Nov 18, 2020 by gibfahn
4
Support Not Generating Transitive Proto Dependencies P4 This is either out of scope or we don't have bandwidth to review a PR. (No assignee)
#62 opened Jun 16, 2020 by naturalwarren
1
Should rules_proto provide a rule to generate docs from .proto files enhancement New feature or request P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#46 opened Dec 29, 2019 by Yannic
2
How to define new proto_lang_toolchains? documentation Improvements or additions to documentation P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee) question Further information is requested
#40 opened Dec 9, 2019 by prestonvanloon
2
Use @com_google_protobuf//:protobuf_deps.bzl to get protobuf dependencies. P3 We're not considering to work on this, but happy to review a PR. (No assignee)
#24 opened Oct 11, 2019 by hlopko
@hlopko
ProTip! Follow long discussions with comments:>50.