test-setup.sh: Attempt to raise the original signal once more #18827
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
On POSIX-like systems, processes may either terminate normally with an integer exit code. The exit code may span the full range of int, even though all but the waitid() function retur the bottom eight bits. In addition to that, processes may terminate abnormally due to a signal (SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, etc.) POSIX shells (sh, bash, etc.) are more restrictive, in that they can only return exit codes between 0 and 126. 127 is used to denote that the executable cannot be found. Exit codes above 128 indicate that the process terminated due to a signal. Right now we let test-setup.sh terminate using the exit code obtained using $?. This means that if a program terminates due to SIGABRT, test-setup.sh terminates with exit code 128+6=134. This causes us to lose some information, as the (remote) execution environment now only sees plain exit codes. This change extends test-setup.sh to check for exit codes above 128. In that case it will send a signal to itself, so that the original signal condition is raised once again. See also: bazelbuild/remote-apis#240
github-actions
bot
added
the
awaiting-review
sgowroji
added
the
team-Remote-Exec
meisterT
approved these changes
Jul 13, 2023
meisterT
added
awaiting-PR-merge
github-actions
bot
removed
the
awaiting-PR-merge
|
@bazel-io flag |
bazel-io
added
the
potential release blocker
iancha1992
pushed a commit
to iancha1992/bazel
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
On POSIX-like systems, processes may either terminate normally with an integer exit code. The exit code may span the full range of int, even though all but the waitid() function retur the bottom eight bits. In addition to that, processes may terminate abnormally due to a signal (SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, etc.) POSIX shells (sh, bash, etc.) are more restrictive, in that they can only return exit codes between 0 and 126. 127 is used to denote that the executable cannot be found. Exit codes above 128 indicate that the process terminated due to a signal. Right now we let test-setup.sh terminate using the exit code obtained using $?. This means that if a program terminates due to SIGABRT, test-setup.sh terminates with exit code 128+6=134. This causes us to lose some information, as the (remote) execution environment now only sees plain exit codes. This change extends test-setup.sh to check for exit codes above 128. In that case it will send a signal to itself, so that the original signal condition is raised once again. See also: bazelbuild/remote-apis#240 Closes bazelbuild#18827. PiperOrigin-RevId: 547773406 Change-Id: Ia29a6ea1eefdb8caa5624a799755b420a61478a0
|
@bazel-io fork 6.3.0 |
bazel-io
removed
the
potential release blocker
iancha1992
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 13, 2023
On POSIX-like systems, processes may either terminate normally with an integer exit code. The exit code may span the full range of int, even though all but the waitid() function retur the bottom eight bits. In addition to that, processes may terminate abnormally due to a signal (SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, etc.) POSIX shells (sh, bash, etc.) are more restrictive, in that they can only return exit codes between 0 and 126. 127 is used to denote that the executable cannot be found. Exit codes above 128 indicate that the process terminated due to a signal. Right now we let test-setup.sh terminate using the exit code obtained using $?. This means that if a program terminates due to SIGABRT, test-setup.sh terminates with exit code 128+6=134. This causes us to lose some information, as the (remote) execution environment now only sees plain exit codes. This change extends test-setup.sh to check for exit codes above 128. In that case it will send a signal to itself, so that the original signal condition is raised once again. See also: bazelbuild/remote-apis#240 Closes #18827. PiperOrigin-RevId: 547773406 Change-Id: Ia29a6ea1eefdb8caa5624a799755b420a61478a0 Co-authored-by: Ed Schouten <[email protected]>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
On POSIX-like systems, processes may either terminate normally with an integer exit code. The exit code may span the full range of int, even though all but the waitid() function retur the bottom eight bits. In addition to that, processes may terminate abnormally due to a signal (SIGABRT, SIGSEGV, etc.)
POSIX shells (sh, bash, etc.) are more restrictive, in that they can only return exit codes between 0 and 126. 127 is used to denote that the executable cannot be found. Exit codes above 128 indicate that the process terminated due to a signal.
Right now we let test-setup.sh terminate using the exit code obtained using $?. This means that if a program terminates due to SIGABRT, test-setup.sh terminates with exit code 128+6=134. This causes us to lose some information, as the (remote) execution environment now only sees plain exit codes.
This change extends test-setup.sh to check for exit codes above 128. In that case it will send a signal to itself, so that the original signal condition is raised once again.
See also: bazelbuild/remote-apis#240