4 additional proposals from egallager #4
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
a few things I'd like to see if using GitHub for legislation
Also I added an additional fourth proposal while I was at it
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I am 1 of 400 state legislators in the state of New Hampshire, and one of the things I have been pushing for has been to get the legislature to start using GitHub (or something like it) for legislation. Unfortunately, GitHub currently lacks a few features that would be necessary before we could actually legislate here. I've outlined some of the ones I noticed with 3 new files in this pull request, as well as a 4th new file for another proposal that just comes from my personal usage of GitHub for other stuff.