Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Coverage Comment #72

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 13, 2023
Merged

Coverage Comment #72

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 13, 2023

Conversation

wistuba
Copy link
Contributor

@wistuba wistuba commented Dec 15, 2022

Bot automatically reports coverage, see below or full example.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@github-actions
Copy link

Coverage report

Note
No coverage data of the default branch was found for comparison. A possible reason for this is that the coverage action has not yet run after a push event and the data is therefore not yet initialized.

The coverage rate is 83.47%.

None of the new lines are part of the tested code. Therefore, there is no coverage data about them.

@wistuba
Copy link
Contributor Author

wistuba commented Dec 16, 2022

This could be an alternative but I think this would need to be enabled by awslabs: https://about.codecov.io/

@610v4nn1
Copy link
Contributor

610v4nn1 commented Dec 16, 2022

I checked codecov and it requires an extensive amount of permissions. Coveralls (https://coveralls.io/) seems to provide a comparable service, at least for our purposes, and it is significantly less invasive. It also needs to be enabled by awslabs.

@610v4nn1 610v4nn1 merged commit 3525aa9 into main Jan 13, 2023
@610v4nn1 610v4nn1 deleted the mw-coverage branch January 13, 2023 16:12
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants