Skip to content

Add 'Vanilla Web' book recommendation to README#234

Open
stjepanjurekovic wants to merge 1 commit intoawesome-css-group:masterfrom
stjepanjurekovic:patch-2
Open

Add 'Vanilla Web' book recommendation to README#234
stjepanjurekovic wants to merge 1 commit intoawesome-css-group:masterfrom
stjepanjurekovic:patch-2

Conversation

@stjepanjurekovic
Copy link
Contributor

@stjepanjurekovic stjepanjurekovic commented Jan 21, 2026

Hi,

Stjepan from Mnning here. I thought this title might be a good match for your list. Thank you for considering it.

Best,

What does this PR do?

Which issue is this PR related to?

If not related to any issue leave blank.

Does this PR follows our contribution guidelines?

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new book reference to the Books section of the documentation.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

Hi,

Stjepan from Mnning here. I thought this title might be a good match for your list. Thank you for considering it.

Best,
@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 21, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new book reference was added to the Books section of README.md, introducing "Vanilla Web" as a guide to building web applications using browser-native tools.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation Update
README.md
Added one book reference entry to the Books section

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A book finds its home on the list so fine,
Vanilla Web now shines in the Books divine,
With browser tools pure, a guide bright and true,
The README blooms with knowledge anew! 📚✨

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely summarizes the main change: adding a book recommendation to the README. It is specific, directly related to the changeset, and accurately describes the primary modification.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant