Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix docs #199

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024
Merged

Fix docs #199

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 23, 2024

Conversation

yardasol
Copy link
Contributor

@yardasol yardasol commented Nov 7, 2023

Summary of changes

This PR fixes the docs not deploying. This is due to a mismatch between the dependencies of v0.4.0 and earlier versions, and v0.5.0.

This PR also removes unused sections of the theory manual, and fleshes out a mathematical description of reprocessing in SaltProc

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Required for Merging

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document.
  • My code follows the code style of this project.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
    • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • My change is a source code change
    • I have added/modified tests to cover my changes
    • I have explained why my change does not require new/modified tests
  • My change is a user-facing change
    • I have recorded my changes in the changelog for the upcoming release
  • My change is exclusively related to the repository (e.g. GitHub actions workflows, PR/issue templates, etc.)
    • x ] I have verified or justified that my change will work as intended.
  • All new and existing tests passed.
    • CI tests pass
    • Local tests pass (including Serpent2 integration tests)

Checklist for Reviewers

Reviewers should use this link to get to the
Review Checklist before they begin their review.

Copy link

@ceserz2 ceserz2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

hey olek, sorry for the late review but everything looks good. Let see if Nathan has anything to add.

Copy link
Contributor

@LukeSeifert LukeSeifert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good! I made a few suggestions, but only minor things. Let me know if you'd like me to merge.

Comment on lines 10 to 11
A material flow represents a material with a given
volume, density, temperature, and nuclide composition.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Represents the flow of a material?


a. The mass of the sum is :math:`m_{1+2} = m_{1} + m_{2}`

b. The composition of the sum is :math:`N_{1+2} = \frac{N_{1} * m_{1} + N_{2} * m_{2}}{m_{1} + m_{2}}`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider including in the above paragraph if N and m are vectors, scalars, etc.

Comment on lines 39 to 40
2. An extraction efficiency, :math:`\epsilon`, for target element(s).
3. A method to apply the process on a :class:`saltproc.Materialflow` object.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove periods for consistency with previous lines

doc/methods/reprocessing.rst Show resolved Hide resolved
SaltProc does not currently track the volume and mass flow rate of waste streams.
In practice, since it is extremely resource intensive to separate individual
isotopes, SaltProc only allows extraction efficiencies to be defined for
elements. So, for any isotope :math:`a` of xenon,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could also mention here that for MSRs, chemical processes operate on elements, so having isotope specific extraction efficiencies is not required

@yardasol
Copy link
Contributor Author

@LukeSeifert it's been a hot minute but I just addressed your comments. If this is good to go lmk.

Copy link
Contributor

@LukeSeifert LukeSeifert left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@LukeSeifert LukeSeifert merged commit cef7ac3 into arfc:master Feb 23, 2024
1 check passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit to khurrumsaleem/saltproc that referenced this pull request Feb 26, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants