Skip to content

[gha][canary] allow external contributors build/lint #992

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 06-18-_gha_allow_external_contributors_build_lint
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rustielin
Copy link
Contributor

@rustielin rustielin commented Jun 18, 2025

Canary for #991

It works because in this stack, this PR is targeting the branch 06-18-_gha_allow_external_contributors_build_lint, so under pull_request_target, it will use the ci.yml workflow file from that branch.

Test plan

CI works, and Semgrep passes

Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 18, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
developer-docs-nextra ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 18, 2025 11:18pm

Copy link
Contributor Author

Warning

This pull request is not mergeable via GitHub because a downstack PR is open. Once all requirements are satisfied, merge this PR as a stack on Graphite.
Learn more

This stack of pull requests is managed by Graphite. Learn more about stacking.

@rustielin rustielin marked this pull request as ready for review June 18, 2025 22:44
@rustielin rustielin requested a review from zi0Black June 18, 2025 22:53
@rustielin rustielin force-pushed the 06-18-_gha_allow_external_contributors_build_lint branch 2 times, most recently from c451f29 to 7675e73 Compare June 18, 2025 23:02
@rustielin rustielin force-pushed the 06-18-_gha_canary_allow_external_contributors_build_lint branch from 1907e47 to 498d84a Compare June 18, 2025 23:02
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant