Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

batching removed #38225

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from
Open

batching removed #38225

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

vsvamsi1
Copy link
Contributor

@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 commented Dec 18, 2024

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags=""

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

If you modify the content in this section, you are likely to disrupt the CI result for your PR.

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added logging for the "EVAL_TREE" method in the worker service to enhance visibility during evaluation.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Adjusted saga execution flow by commenting out concurrent execution lines, improving control over batch processing.

@vsvamsi1 vsvamsi1 self-assigned this Dec 18, 2024
@vsvamsi1
Copy link
Contributor Author

/build-deploy-preview skip-tests=true

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 18, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to two files: BatchSagas.tsx and WorkerUtil.ts. In BatchSagas.tsx, the saga root function's concurrent execution has been commented out, altering the control flow for batch processing. In WorkerUtil.ts, a new logging statement has been added to the GracefulWorkerService class, specifically for the "EVAL_TREE" method, to provide more visibility into the evaluation process.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/client/src/sagas/BatchSagas.tsx Commented out yield all([...]) to disable concurrent saga execution
app/client/src/utils/WorkerUtil.ts Added console log for "EVAL_TREE" method in GracefulWorkerService

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Bug, skip-changelog, ok-to-test

Suggested reviewers

  • rajatagrawal
  • ApekshaBhosale
  • dvj1988

Poem

🚀 Sagas paused, workers sing,
Logs whisper secrets they bring,
Code dances, a subtle art,
Debugging's mysterious start!
Refactoring's gentle wing 🛠️

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Deploying Your Preview: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/12390781126.
Workflow: On demand build Docker image and deploy preview.
skip-tests: true.
env: ``.
PR: 38225.
recreate: .

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 836b544 and eb09ace.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/client/src/sagas/BatchSagas.tsx (2 hunks)
  • app/client/src/utils/WorkerUtil.ts (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/client/src/utils/WorkerUtil.ts (1)

284-285: Verify worker load handling without batch processing

With batch processing disabled in BatchSagas.tsx, verify that the worker can handle the potential increase in individual EVAL_TREE requests.

Comment on lines +92 to +95
// yield all([
// debounce(20, ReduxActionTypes.EXECUTE_BATCH, executeBatchSaga),
// takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.BATCHED_UPDATE, storeUpdatesSaga),
// ]);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Batch processing mechanism is disabled

Commenting out the saga effects disables the entire batch processing mechanism. Without these effects:

  • executeBatchSaga won't process batched actions
  • storeUpdatesSaga won't handle incoming updates
  • Actions will accumulate in the batches array without being processed

Restore the saga effects or provide an alternative mechanism:

- // yield all([
- //   debounce(20, ReduxActionTypes.EXECUTE_BATCH, executeBatchSaga),
- //   takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.BATCHED_UPDATE, storeUpdatesSaga),
- // ]);
+ yield all([
+   debounce(20, ReduxActionTypes.EXECUTE_BATCH, executeBatchSaga),
+   takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.BATCHED_UPDATE, storeUpdatesSaga),
+ ]);
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
// yield all([
// debounce(20, ReduxActionTypes.EXECUTE_BATCH, executeBatchSaga),
// takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.BATCHED_UPDATE, storeUpdatesSaga),
// ]);
yield all([
debounce(20, ReduxActionTypes.EXECUTE_BATCH, executeBatchSaga),
takeEvery(ReduxActionTypes.BATCHED_UPDATE, storeUpdatesSaga),
]);

Comment on lines +284 to +285
// eslint-disable-next-line no-console
method === "EVAL_TREE" && console.log("*** evaluation");
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Replace console.log with proper logging

Using console.log in production code is not recommended. Additionally, the log message lacks context and timestamp information.

Replace with proper logging:

- // eslint-disable-next-line no-console
- method === "EVAL_TREE" && console.log("*** evaluation");
+ method === "EVAL_TREE" && log.debug(`Starting evaluation for request ${messageId}`);

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Copy link

Deploy-Preview-URL: https://ce-38225.dp.appsmith.com

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant