Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

test: analyse Analytics spec #37239

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from
Open

test: analyse Analytics spec #37239

wants to merge 1 commit into from
+1 −1

Conversation

NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator

@NandanAnantharamu NandanAnantharamu commented Nov 5, 2024 •
edited by coderabbitai bot
Loading

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Updated test specification to focus on the "Analytics" feature instead of the "Fork Template" functionality.

@coderabbitai coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 5, 2024 •
edited
Loading

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updating the limited-tests.txt file within the Cypress testing framework. The specific modification replaces the path of a test specification file from Fork_Template_spec.js to Analytics_spec.js, indicating a transition in testing focus from the "Fork Template" feature to the "Analytics" feature within the "Other UI Features" category. The overall structure and comments in the file remain unchanged.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt Updated test specification from Fork_Template_spec.js to Analytics_spec.js.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test, Test

Suggested reviewers

  • ApekshaBhosale
  • sagar-qa007

🎉 In the land of code where tests reside,
A shift in focus, we take in stride.
From Fork Templates to Analytics we go,
Ensuring our features continue to flow.
With Cypress at hand, we’ll test with glee,
Embracing the changes, as happy as can be! 🎊

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0b2cffb and 15aaf7c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (1)

Pattern app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:

  • Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
  • Avoid using cy.wait in code.
  • Avoid using cy.pause in code.
  • Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
  • Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
  • Use data-* attributes for selectors.
  • Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
  • Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
  • Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
  • Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
  • Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
  • Avoid using it.only.
  • Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
  • Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
  • Avoid using strings for assertions.
  • Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
  • Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt (2)

2-2: LGTM - Path update is consistent with PR objectives.

The change aligns with the PR title "test: analyse Analytics spec" and moves the test specification to the appropriate OtherUIFeatures directory.

2-2: Verify the test specification file existence and dependencies.

The path change looks correct, but let's verify the file structure.

✅ Verification successful

Test specification file exists and no conflicting references found

The Analytics_spec.js file exists at the correct location and there are no remaining references to Fork_Template_spec, confirming this is a clean path update.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Verify the existence of the new test specification file
fd "Analytics_spec.js" app/client/cypress/

# Check for any remaining references to the old spec file
rg "Fork_Template_spec" app/client/cypress/

Length of output: 165

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100

@github-actions github-actions bot added skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Test labels Nov 5, 2024
@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11683656118.
Cypress dashboard
PR: #37239.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11683656118.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All Cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 300 Total Passed: 0 Total Failed: 102 Total Skipped: 198 *****************************

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11686715313.
Cypress dashboard
PR: #37239.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2024

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11686715313.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All Cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 300 Total Passed: 3 Total Failed: 99 Total Skipped: 198 *****************************

@NandanAnantharamu
Copy link
Collaborator Author

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=100

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11793553712.
Cypress dashboard
PR: #37239.

@github-actions GitHub Actions
Copy link

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11793553712.
Cypress dashboard url: Click here!
All Cypress tests have passed 🎉🎉🎉

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 300 Total Passed: 3 Total Failed: 99 Total Skipped: 198 *****************************

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale Awaiting requested review from ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale is a code owner

@sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 Awaiting requested review from sagar-qa007 sagar-qa007 is a code owner

At least 1 approving review is required to merge this pull request.

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog Test
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@NandanAnantharamu