fix: fixed autocommit spec for airgap #36579
Conversation
brayn003
requested review from
ApekshaBhosale and
sagar-qa007
as code owners
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces changes to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitAutocommit_spec.ts (1)
Line range hint
1-68: Good job on following best practices, but there's always room for improvement!Class, you've done a commendable job following our Cypress best practices. It's like you've all been paying attention in class! However, let's see if we can make this test even better:
On line 45, we're using
cy.wait('@gitAutocommitTriggerApi'). While this isn't as bad as using a hardcoded time, we could make it more robust. Consider usingcy.waitUntil()or a custom command that checks for the specific condition we're waiting for.Our test case name "Check if autocommit progress bar is visible and network requests are properly called" is good, but it could be more specific. Remember, a good test name is like a good essay title - it should clearly convey what we're testing.
Here's a suggestion for improvement:
it("should display autocommit progress bar and correctly handle API requests for Git autocommit", function () { // ... existing test code ... });This name more precisely describes what we're testing and what we expect to happen.
Keep up the good work, and remember - in the world of testing, there's always room for improvement!
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitAutocommit_spec.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitAutocommit_spec.ts (1)
Pattern
app/client/cypress/**/**.*: Review the following e2e test code written using the Cypress test library. Ensure that:
- Follow best practices for Cypress code and e2e automation.
- Avoid using cy.wait in code.
- Avoid using cy.pause in code.
- Avoid using agHelper.sleep().
- Use locator variables for locators and do not use plain strings.
- Use data-* attributes for selectors.
- Avoid Xpaths, Attributes and CSS path.
- Avoid selectors like .btn.submit or button[type=submit].
- Perform logins via API with LoginFromAPI.
- Perform logout via API with LogOutviaAPI.
- Perform signup via API with SignupFromAPI.
- Avoid using it.only.
- Avoid using after and aftereach in test cases.
- Use multiple assertions for expect statements.
- Avoid using strings for assertions.
- Do not use duplicate filenames even with different paths.
- Avoid using agHelper.Sleep, this.Sleep in any file in code.
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitAutocommit_spec.ts (2)
9-9: Well done, class! The repository name has been updated correctly.The change from "TED-testrepo1" to "TED-autocommit-test-1" is spot on. It aligns perfectly with our lesson plan... I mean, PR objectives. This new name is like a well-labeled beaker in our science lab - it clearly indicates what we're testing. Keep up the good work!
18-18: Excellent tag management, students! But let's double-check our work.You've done a splendid job updating the tags. Removing "@tag.excludeForAirgap" is like erasing the "Do Not Enter" sign from our airgap classroom - it's now open for all! Adding "@tag.TedMigration" is intriguing, like a new subject in our curriculum.
However, let's make sure we understand the purpose of this new tag. Can you raise your hand and explain why we're using "@tag.TedMigration"? It's always good to know the reason behind every change in our test suite.
Let's do a quick search to see if this new tag is used consistently:
✅ Verification successful
Let's adjust our search to correctly target TypeScript files. We'll use file globs to ensure that all
.tsand.tsxfiles are included in the search.
Great job on updating the tags!
I've checked the usage of
@tag.TedMigrationacross the codebase, and it appears solely in the intended location withinGitAutocommit_spec.ts. Everything looks consistent and properly integrated.Keep up the excellent work!
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of @tag.TedMigration across the codebase # Test: Search for @tag.TedMigration in all TypeScript files rg --type typescript '@tag.TedMigration'Length of output: 75
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Check for the usage of @tag.TedMigration across the codebase # Test: Search for @tag.TedMigration in TypeScript files rg --glob '*.ts' --glob '*.tsx' '@tag.TedMigration'Length of output: 149
Description
Changes autocommit test repo to a new airgap compatiable repo
Automation
🔍 Cypress test results
Tip
🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11065723641
Commit: ed27652
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: ``
Spec: cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitAutocommit_spec.ts
Fri, 27 Sep 2024 06:55:15 UTC
Communication
Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?
Summary by CodeRabbit