test: replace 3rd party API

[NandanAnantharamu]

replacing 3rd party API with TED

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.IDE"

Tip

🟢 🟢 🟢 All cypress tests have passed! 🎉 🎉 🎉
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11030796227
Commit: 1630d9b
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.IDE
Spec:

---

Wed, 25 Sep 2024 10:35:53 UTC

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the Cypress test suite, specifically updating the URL in the CreateAndFillApi function for the "Api Error Debugger" test suite. The URL was modified from a fake API endpoint to a local Docker host. Additionally, the test file for limited tests was updated to focus on API error handling, replacing a previous template test file.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
app/client/cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/OtherUIFeatures/ApiError_spec.ts	Updated the API endpoint URL in the test suite and replaced the entry in limited tests to focus on API error handling.
app/client/cypress/limited-tests.txt	Replaced the entry for Fork_Template_spec.js with ApiError_spec.ts, shifting the focus of limited tests to API error handling.

Possibly related PRs

• fix: Fixed flaky fork template test case #36200: Updates limited-tests.txt to replace Fork_Template_spec.js, indicating a shift in focus to a different test file.
• fix: flaky mongo spec test #36220: Similar to fix: Fixed flaky fork template test case #36200, this PR also updates limited-tests.txt by replacing the Fork_Template_spec.js entry.
• chore: fix select1 spec #36228: Modifies limited-tests.txt to comment out Fork_Template_spec.js and add a new entry for Select1_spec.ts.
• fix: Fixed Bug29566 spec with list widget #36260: Updates limited-tests.txt to replace Fork_Template_spec.js with Bug29566_Spec.ts.
• test: fix DataSourceScheme #36339: Changes the entry in limited-tests.txt from Fork_Template_spec.js to DatasourceSchema_spec.ts.
• test: fix test in airgap for canvas context prop #36519: Updates limited-tests.txt to replace Fork_Template_spec.js with Canvas_Context_Property_Pane_1_spec.js.

Suggested labels

skip-changelog, ok-to-test, Test

Suggested reviewers

• ApekshaBhosale
• sagar-qa007

Poem

In the realm of code where tests do play,
A new path emerges, brightening the way.
From fake to Docker, the URL's been spun,
API errors now face the light of the sun.
Limited tests shift, a fresh focus in sight,
Celebrating changes, oh what a delight! 🎉

---

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Generate unit testing code for this file.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[NandanAnantharamu]

/ci-test-limit-count run_count=25

[github-actions]

Tests running at: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11028230530.
Cypress dashboard
PR: #36528.

[github-actions]

Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/11028230530.
Cypress dashboard: Click here!
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:
To know the list of identified flaky tests - Refer here

***** Repeat Run Summary ***** Total Tests with repeat: 50 Total Passed: 50 Total Failed: 0 Total Skipped: 0 *****************************