Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
PRO-2913: add writing tests for modules documentation #237
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
PRO-2913: add writing tests for modules documentation #237
Changes from all commits
3ee8009
ff764f4
43a841b
f0c2af5
9d73c0d
a4a8f4e
02b6d69
d6fd36e
4820792
195c2e2
3cae079
9c6df58
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't think our docs cover turning Apostrophe modules into npm packages in general yet. And I think a lot of people reading this page will want to know about how to write integration tests for their project-level modules. Maybe we're not ready to address that yet but I think it's probably the more common use case for our audience.
I'm not saying we can't get this article out there, but we should follow up with a page about how to publish your open source apostrophe module, and an update to this page to cover integration tests for project level modules.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Linting and integration testing aren't the same thing. Should we acknowledge this somewhere, maybe mention we're including linting too and what that gets us?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good chance to say why and what this gets us.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think an additional sentence here or below the code block at around line 77 should be added. Something like:
"While not strictly part of integration testing, running ESLint alongside the Mocha test(s) reduces potential code error and ensures your module code conforms to the style of other Apostrophe modules."
Note: I'm not sure if this is the most accurate statement. You might want to edit it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
"As your test grows, you can break it down into multiple files based on your liking."
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you add a comment about whether this is optional and that you need to set an environment variable? I know you have a description of setting it below, but a reminder here would be good.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is confusing. First, you've set up to run the tests using the hypothetical article module. I realize that you include the example URL for '@apostrophecms/login-hcaptcha`, but sticking with the one example the whole way through is less confusing. Second, that module has a lot of tests. I'm worried that if the end reader attempts to run the tests for themselves with the actual module, the output will be significantly different and confusing. I would actually mockup the expected results from running this on the example module.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm OK with you guys taking this the rest of the way.