Skip to content

chore: sync Go client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-08-27T071624Z - #23

Merged
Pijukatel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/adoring-bohr-nq1gxv
Aug 31, 2026
Merged

chore: sync Go client with Apify OpenAPI spec v2-2026-08-27T071624Z#23
Pijukatel merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
claude/adoring-bohr-nq1gxv

Conversation

@Pijukatel

@Pijukatel Pijukatel commented Aug 28, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Syncs the client's pinned OpenAPI specification version from v2-2026-08-14T072928Z to the latest published v2-2026-08-27T071624Z.

The spec delta over this range (a RequestWithoutId bundling fix, removal of CreateActorRequest.pricingInfos, and validation/enum autofixes to ActorNotice, StoreListActor.pictureUrl, the ErrorType enum, and two documented error responses) lands entirely on surfaces the client either does not model or handles generically (untyped Create body, Extra-bag decode, string APIError.Type), so no functional code change is required — only the version pin and metadata are updated.

Changes

  • version.go: bump APISpecVersion to v2-2026-08-27T071624Z and ClientVersion to 0.8.3.
  • README.md: update the documented APISpecVersion example (was stale by one spec version).
  • CHANGELOG.md: add the 0.8.3 entry.

Verification

  • gofmt -l ., go vet ./..., go build ./..., and golangci-lint run ./... all clean.
  • Full unit and live integration test suites green against the live API.

@github-actions github-actions Bot added this to the 148th sprint - Tooling team milestone Aug 28, 2026
@github-actions github-actions Bot added the t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. label Aug 28, 2026
@Pijukatel
Pijukatel force-pushed the claude/adoring-bohr-nq1gxv branch from 37718a9 to aa2a081 Compare August 28, 2026 10:18
@Pijukatel
Pijukatel merged commit 3716ff7 into master Aug 31, 2026
2 checks passed
@Pijukatel
Pijukatel deleted the claude/adoring-bohr-nq1gxv branch August 31, 2026 06:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants