-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.3k
[SPARK-58208][SQL] Deep-copy stateful expressions before optimization #57980
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
marcuslin123
wants to merge
1
commit into
apache:master
Choose a base branch
from
marcuslin123:codex/spark-58208-stateful-expression-copies
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
mapExpressions uses fastEquals to decide whether an expression actually changed:
This works for NamedLambdaVariable because value: AtomicReference is a constructor argument — two NLVs with different AtomicReference instances are not structurally equal, so fastEquals returns false and the fresh copy sticks.
But for expressions like RegExpReplace, StringTranslate, FormatNumber (SPARK-58204), the mutable state lives in a @transient var — not in the constructor. A fresh copy of RegExpReplace has identical constructor args (subject, regexp, replacement), so fastEquals returns true and the fresh copy is silently discarded — the deep-copy becomes a no-op for those expressions.
In practice this is not a correctness issue today —
ConvertToLocalRelationhas its own directfreshCopyIfContainsStatefulExpression()call that covers driver-side evaluation, and non-local plans serialize fresh copies to each executor task. But it is a latent gap for future stateful expressions.A simple fix is to use reference equality (ne) instead: