fix: shade async-profiler packages

[zhengziyi0117]

• Associated with issue [Bug] Agent should shade async-profiler packages skywalking#12748
• Update the CHANGES log.

[wu-sheng]

Could you post the screenshot of new binary package here?

And, have you tested the feature again? Shading sometimes breaks the function.

[zhengziyi0117]

Could you post the screenshot of new binary package here?你能在这里发布新的二进制包的屏幕截图吗？

And, have you tested the feature again? Shading sometimes breaks the function.而且，您再次测试过该功能吗？阴影有时会破坏功能。

I have tested it locally and the original function is normal.

The following is the package structure diagram:

[wu-sheng]

About the so files, are they able to move as well?

[zhengziyi0117]

About the so files, are they able to move as well?

The .so file has not been moved yet.

I think it should not be possible to move the .so file because the async-profiler code gets the dynamic library path based on the following code
String resourceName = "/" + getPlatformTag() + "/libasyncProfiler.so";

[lujiajing1126]

It is a solution as long as you understand that shading in the agent package instead of agent-core will make it impossible to be used from other packages like plugins

[wu-sheng]

It is a solution as long as you understand that shading in the agent package instead of agent-core will make it impossible to be used from other packages like plugins

Do you mean you prefer to move this(shade) into core module? I think plugins would not access this part of codes.

[lujiajing1126]

It is a solution as long as you understand that shading in the agent package instead of agent-core will make it impossible to be used from other packages like plugins

Do you mean you prefer to move this(shade) into core module? I think plugins would not access this part of codes.

I am OK with this one.

[wu-sheng]

@zhengziyi0117 Could you try that?
I think we don't need async profilor accessible from.plugins.

[wu-sheng]

I think you should have this?