arch/sim: Add sigdelset to nuttx-names.in

[W-M-R]

sigdelset is used in up_enable_irq: sigdelset(&act.sa_mask, SIGSTOP);

Note: Please adhere to Contributing Guidelines.

Summary

arch/sim: Add sigdelset to nuttx-names.in

Impact

none

Testing

citest

[acassis]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

[xiaoxiang781216]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document?

[acassis]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document.

@xiaoxiang781216 the idea is to keep the signal documentation updated and since he is working on signal, this is the right moment to do it:

[xiaoxiang781216]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document.

@xiaoxiang781216 the idea is to keep the signal documentation updated and since he is working on signal, this is the right moment to do it:

here is https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html#c.sigdelset

[acassis]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document.

@xiaoxiang781216 the idea is to keep the signal documentation updated and since he is working on signal, this is the right moment to do it:

here is https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html#c.sigdelset

But and the remaining signals that should be in that table?

CONFIG_SIG_SIGPIPE_ACTION
CONFIG_SIG_SIGPROF_ACTION
CONFIG_SIG_SIGURG_ACTION
etc

Please take a look here: sched/signal/sig_default.c

[xiaoxiang781216]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document.

@xiaoxiang781216 the idea is to keep the signal documentation updated and since he is working on signal, this is the right moment to do it:

here is https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html#c.sigdelset

But and the remaining signals that should be in that table?

CONFIG_SIG_SIGPIPE_ACTION CONFIG_SIG_SIGPROF_ACTION CONFIG_SIG_SIGURG_ACTION etc

Please take a look here: sched/signal/sig_default.c

This pr doesn't touch sig_default.c, so the update shouldn't belong to this pr. @acassis if you find something miss, please provide a patch to fix it, it doesn't make sense to ask contributor to update the doc which doesn't make related modification.

[acassis]

@W-M-R please update the Documentation: https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html

@acassis this patch doesn't add/remove nuttx signal api, why do you request @W-M-R update document.

@xiaoxiang781216 the idea is to keep the signal documentation updated and since he is working on signal, this is the right moment to do it:

here is https://nuttx.apache.org/docs/latest/reference/user/07_signals.html#c.sigdelset

But and the remaining signals that should be in that table?
CONFIG_SIG_SIGPIPE_ACTION CONFIG_SIG_SIGPROF_ACTION CONFIG_SIG_SIGURG_ACTION etc
Please take a look here: sched/signal/sig_default.c

This pr doesn't touch sig_default.c, so the update shouldn't belong to this pr. @acassis if you find something miss, please provide a patch to fix it, it doesn't make sense to ask contributor to update the doc which doesn't make related modification.

Ok, yes I can dismiss the Change Request, but the point is: our Documentation is outdated, so everything someone is working is some relative feature that needs to be improved, we need to use request it. Even the file sig_default.c is not modified, the person modifying signals is the authority, they know more about signals than someone working on other features.

[acassis]

@W-M-R so I will let it for you: can you update the signals Documentation or will let us continue with outdated Documentation? Do you want to improve our Documentation?