[#2353] Improvement: Fix the warning: unchecked method invocation: method sendCachedBuffer in class RMRecordsReader.RecordsCombiner is applied to given types
#2358
+12
−5
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
cchung100m
changed the title
sendCachedBuffer in class RMRecordsReader.RecordsCombiner is applied to given typessendCachedBuffer in class RMRecordsReader.RecordsCombiner is applied to given types
…on: method sendCachedBuffer in class RMRecordsReader.RecordsCombiner is applied to given types
cchung100m
force-pushed
the
issue-2353
branch
from
0ebb3bd to
934a972
Compare
Test Results 2 981 files ±0 2 981 suites ±0 6h 29m 33s ⏱️ + 1m 9s For more details on these errors, see this check. Results for commit 934a972. ± Comparison against base commit e5cfc4a. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Fix the warning: unchecked call to put(E) as a member of the raw type
RMRecordsReader.QueueWhy are the changes needed?
Fix: #2353
Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
current UT