Skip to content

Conversation

@liuyongvs
Copy link
Contributor

What is the purpose of the change

The PR migrates DecomposeGroupingSetsRule to java

Verifying this change

This change is already covered by existing tests

Does this pull request potentially affect one of the following parts:

  • Dependencies (does it add or upgrade a dependency): (no)
  • The public API, i.e., is any changed class annotated with @Public(Evolving): (no)
  • The serializers: (no)
  • The runtime per-record code paths (performance sensitive): (no)
  • Anything that affects deployment or recovery: JobManager (and its components), Checkpointing, Kubernetes/Yarn, ZooKeeper: (no)
  • The S3 file system connector: (no)

Documentation

  • Does this pull request introduce a new feature? (no)
  • If yes, how is the feature documented? (not applicable)

@liuyongvs liuyongvs force-pushed the DecomposeGroupingSetsRule branch from 04cb7bd to 3437835 Compare January 5, 2026 02:27
@liuyongvs liuyongvs changed the title [FLINK-36992][table] Migrate DecomposeGroupingSetsRule to java [FLINK-37002][table] Migrate DecomposeGroupingSetsRule to java Jan 5, 2026
@flinkbot
Copy link
Collaborator

flinkbot commented Jan 5, 2026

CI report:

Bot commands The @flinkbot bot supports the following commands:
  • @flinkbot run azure re-run the last Azure build

Copy link
Contributor

@davidradl davidradl left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Assuming the test coverage is good, I see the build passes; this looks good to me.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community. label Jan 6, 2026
import java.util.stream.IntStream;
import java.util.stream.Stream;

import scala.collection.JavaConverters;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can we avoid this in java?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

for instance use JavaScalaConversionUtil instead

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

community-reviewed PR has been reviewed by the community.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants