Skip to content

[refactoring](multi-catalog)data_lake_reader_refactoring.#62293

Draft
hubgeter wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
hubgeter:local_reader_refactor_v3
Draft

[refactoring](multi-catalog)data_lake_reader_refactoring.#62293
hubgeter wants to merge 1 commit intoapache:masterfrom
hubgeter:local_reader_refactor_v3

Conversation

@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@hubgeter hubgeter commented Apr 9, 2026

What problem does this PR solve?

Issue Number: close #xxx

Related PR: #xxx

Problem Summary:

Release note

None

Check List (For Author)

  • Test

    • Regression test
    • Unit Test
    • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
    • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
      • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
      • Previous test can cover this change.
      • No code files have been changed.
      • Other reason
  • Behavior changed:

    • No.
    • Yes.
  • Does this need documentation?

    • No.
    • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

  • Confirm the release note
  • Confirm test cases
  • Confirm document
  • Add branch pick label

@Thearas
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Thearas commented Apr 9, 2026

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

  1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
  2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
  3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
  4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
  5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Apr 9, 2026

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 37.21% (16/43) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Apr 9, 2026

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 78.48% (1798/2291)
Line Coverage 64.09% (32267/50344)
Region Coverage 65.05% (16242/24967)
Branch Coverage 55.58% (8681/15620)

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

FE UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 37.21% (16/43) 🎉
Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

@hubgeter hubgeter force-pushed the local_reader_refactor_v3 branch from 56aa09e to ea4e7ee Compare April 9, 2026 16:59
@hubgeter
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

hubgeter commented Apr 9, 2026

run buildall

@hello-stephen
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Cloud UT Coverage Report

Increment line coverage 🎉

Increment coverage report
Complete coverage report

Category Coverage
Function Coverage 78.48% (1798/2291)
Line Coverage 64.10% (32272/50344)
Region Coverage 65.04% (16238/24967)
Branch Coverage 55.58% (8681/15620)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants