-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
[Veeam] disable jobs but keep backups #6589
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build |
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
UI build: ✔️ |
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
Found UI changes, kicking a new UI QA build |
@acs-robot a Jenkins job has been kicked to build UI QA env. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
UI build: ✔️ |
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 3904 |
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 3908 |
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✖️ debian ✖️ suse15. SL-JID 3914 |
Packaging result: ✖️ el7 ✖️ el8 ✖️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 3918 |
Packaging result: ✔️ el7 ✔️ el8 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 3937 |
@blueorangutan test matrix |
@DaanHoogland a Trillian-Jenkins matrix job (centos7 mgmt + xs71, centos7 mgmt + vmware65, centos7 mgmt + kvmcentos7) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
Trillian test result (tid-4642)
|
@DaanHoogland, could you trigger the marvin tests here? |
@blueorangutan package |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 11455 |
@BryanMLima , as this a Veeam fix , should it be a vmware run? |
Yep, it should be. |
@blueorangutan test ol9 vmware-70u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol9 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-11735)
|
plugins/hypervisors/vmware/src/main/java/com/cloud/hypervisor/guru/VMwareGuru.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
engine/schema/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/backup/dao/BackupDaoImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
server/src/main/java/org/apache/cloudstack/backup/BackupManagerImpl.java
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
@blueorangutan package |
@hsato03 a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 12954 |
@blueorangutan test ol9 vmware-70u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol9 mgmt + vmware-70u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
[SF] Trillian Build Failed (tid-12902) |
@blueorangutan test ol9 vmware-80u3 |
@DaanHoogland a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol9 mgmt + vmware-80u3) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
This pull request has merge conflicts. Dear author, please fix the conflicts and sync your branch with the base branch. |
Description
Using the VMWare hypervisor, with the Veeam plugin active, it is not possible to remove the VM from its Backup Offering without removing its backups. To resolve this limitation, a new parameter has been added to the
removeVirtualMachineFromBackupOffering
API to allow users to disable the job but keep Veeam backups. So, when removing a VM from a Backup Offering, it is possible to pass the forced parameter to true, which will remove the job and the backups. Otherwise, the job will just be disabled and the backups will be kept.Types of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
How Has This Been Tested?
It was tested in a local lab:
force
option as false, and checked if, in Veeam, the job was still there, in the disabled state, and if the backups were still stored too;force
option and check if the backups and job are deleted in Veeam.