-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
CKS: skip default egress policy check for vpc network offerings #11998
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 4.22
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
@blueorangutan package |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Jenkins job has been kicked to build packages. It will be bundled with KVM, XenServer and VMware SystemVM templates. I'll keep you posted as I make progress. |
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## 4.22 #11998 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 17.56% 17.56% -0.01%
+ Complexity 15545 15542 -3
============================================
Files 5909 5909
Lines 529056 529056
Branches 64617 64617
============================================
- Hits 92947 92919 -28
- Misses 425654 425684 +30
+ Partials 10455 10453 -2
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
|
Packaging result [SF]: ✔️ el8 ✔️ el9 ✔️ el10 ✔️ debian ✔️ suse15. SL-JID 15648 |
|
@blueorangutan test |
|
@weizhouapache a [SL] Trillian-Jenkins test job (ol8 mgmt + kvm-ol8) has been kicked to run smoke tests |
|
[SF] Trillian test result (tid-14774)
|
Description
This PR fixes #11995
Steps to reproduce the issue
DefaultIsolatedNetworkOfferingForVpcNetworksexpected: succeed
actual: failed with error
Kubernetes service has not been configured properly to provision Kubernetes clustersTypes of changes
Feature/Enhancement Scale or Bug Severity
Feature/Enhancement Scale
Bug Severity
Screenshots (if appropriate):
How Has This Been Tested?
How did you try to break this feature and the system with this change?