Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When the thread has been interrupted, there is no need for waitBackOffTime #3961

Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -265,12 +265,12 @@ public void run() {
} catch (UnavailableException e) {
LOG.error("UnavailableException "
+ "while replicating fragments", e);
waitBackOffTime(rwRereplicateBackoffMs);
if (Thread.currentThread().isInterrupted()) {
LOG.error("Interrupted while replicating fragments");
shutdown();
return;
}
waitBackOffTime(rwRereplicateBackoffMs);
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

We already handled the InterruptedException at line 251. It looks like there want to check if the thread is interrupted after waiting the time. In the waitBackOffTime, it may interrupt the current thread.

}
}
LOG.info("ReplicationWorker exited loop!");
Expand Down