-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
FEAT: VSin, ISin Sources added to Maxwell Circuit Primitives #5283
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Create Page and Select Page added to Circuit Primitives
Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying: @ansys-reviewer-bot review |
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #5283 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 84.33% 40.52% -43.82%
===========================================
Files 140 140
Lines 58460 58490 +30
===========================================
- Hits 49305 23701 -25604
- Misses 9155 34789 +25634 |
Create Page and Select Page added to Circuit Primitives
…s' into 5282-Add-Missing-Circuit-Elements # Conflicts: # src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_circuit.py
Create Page and Select Page added to Circuit Primitives
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for the changes, could you address the comments and add tests ?
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Create Page added to Circuit Primitives
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
@DaveTwyman please install pre-commit in your venv because I see that every time you push a commit it automatically triggers the auto fixes pre-commit: Also remember to update and merge main in your branch from time to time. |
@gmalinve Good point about the pre-commit, I see it's installed on my machine. I've just updated it too. I guess the issue is I need to start using it before each push. I believe I'm updating main before each push from PyCharm, but let me know if you can see evidence something is wrong here. Thanks again as always |
@DaveTwyman If it is installed on your machine then it shouldn't let you commit. The precommit should trigger the problems locally before allowing you to make any commit. |
Ok, understood, I'm just reading up on how to set this up now |
@DaveTwyman you need to add unit tests now :) |
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
use_instance_id_netlist=use_instance_id_netlist, | ||
) | ||
|
||
id.set_property("Ia", value) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DaveTwyman this is not correct, please debug and see what happens when you set a property that doesn't exist. You access "Ia" through parameters. you don't have to use set_property.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @gmalinve, I just double checked and this works, I couldn't get a bug to appear.
Ia is one of the ten parameters that ISin can take and the most used parameter (it's the amplitude of the sinusoidal current), it's fed into PyAEDT 'create_isin' using the 'value' parameter. I did think of renaming 'value' to something like 'IPeak', 'Current' etc but since the rest of the Maxwell circuit components in the library have a 'value' parameter I've stuck with using 'value' for consistency. The usage of '.set_property' is throughout the rest of the 'primitives_maxwell_circuit' .
Were you suggesting another approach to 'set_property' that has some advantages?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@DaveTwyman this is not a bug. You simply have to access the property and change its value through the "parameters" property, without using the set_property method.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi @gmalinve , Sorry I'm not following this, could you tell me what you would replace line 326 with and why?
All the other circuit components in the library use this "set_property" approach
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
src/ansys/aedt/core/modeler/circuits/primitives_maxwell_circuit.py
Outdated
Show resolved
Hide resolved
@DaveTwyman also please link your issue to this PR so once this is closed they both will be. |
Renamed create_vsin and create_isin to create_v_sin and create_i_sin
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you please use component
as variable name instead of comp_name
? This could be confusing for future maintenance as it gives the impression that the variable is a string when it is not.
Also can you add a test for create_page
?
Thanks again for taking the time to perform all the requested changes.
@SMoraisAnsys , Not at all, thanks for your patience whilst I work through this. I could do with some guidance on the unit test for the 'create_page', there is no way to check on the pages name, index or other properties, the underlying IronPython doesn't have such a feature. Are you aware of another instance in PyAEDT where we create something that cannot then be queried. I could then copy that UT. In this case there isn't a useful check that can be added to the UT. Should we do something like add a dummy UT, that just holds a comment? |
…ges. All elements now support names that are Strings, Integers, Floats or left blank as per expected Maxwell circuit schematic usage.
I went through |
Yes!, 'GetNumPages', how did I miss that, Thanks |
Hi @DaveTwyman, could you please add the last changes required for this PR ? :) |
Yes, I'm planning to get back to finish that shortly
…________________________________
From: Sébastien Morais ***@***.***>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2024 10:45
To: ansys/pyaedt ***@***.***>
Cc: David Twyman ***@***.***>; Mention ***@***.***>
Subject: Re: [ansys/pyaedt] FEAT: VSin, ISin Sources added to Maxwell Circuit Primitives (PR #5283)
[External Sender]
Hi @DaveTwyman<https://github.com/DaveTwyman>, could you please add the last changes required for this PR ? :)
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub<#5283 (comment)>, or unsubscribe<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AVVIYTCE36KV4RDR3OZAJQDZ55RNJAVCNFSM6AAAAABPYVZE36VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDINBTHA3DMNBZGQ>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>
|
Hello @SMoraisAnsys , I've added the last unit test, and method needed to support that test (plus another unit test for the new method). So all the new methods now have supporting unit tests. It seems that the test coverage codecov is very low, do you think this is because of making multiple single line changes 'id' to 'component' or issues elsewhere? |
Try to run your test locally and see if it is correctly covered. It might be a codecov issue (but I doubt about it). |
Create Page and Select Page added to Circuit Primitives