-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
refactor: Improve base Modifier class design #190
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
|
Cursor Agent can help with this pull request. Just |
- Convert Modifier class to abstract class - Make run() method abstract to enforce implementation in subclasses - All 6 modifier subclasses already override run(), so this is safe - Improves API clarity and TypeScript type safety Closes #187
cacd25c to
7c23377
Compare
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request correctly refactors the Modifier base class to be abstract and introduces an abstract run method. This is a good design improvement that enforces a clear contract for all subclasses. However, this is a breaking change, and the pull request is incomplete because it doesn't update the existing Modifier subclasses. As a result, the project will fail to compile. I've left a critical comment detailing the necessary changes in the subclasses to align with the new abstract base class.
- Convert arrow function properties to method declarations in all subclasses - Add missing 'everything' parameter to SyncBondsModifier and ColorModifier - Remove semicolons after method declarations for consistency - All 6 modifier subclasses now properly implement the abstract run() method Addresses PR review feedback about breaking changes
- Remove return newParticles from SyncParticlesModifier.run() - Change return newBonds to return in SyncBondsModifier.run() - Both methods now correctly return void to match abstract method signature
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a great improvement, refactoring the Modifier class to be abstract and ensuring the run() method is implemented by all subclasses. This improves the API contract and type safety. The changes are applied consistently across all modifier implementations. I found one issue in ColorModifier where the everything parameter was not being passed down, which I've commented on. As a potential follow-up, you might consider converting runByType and runByProperty in ColorModifier from arrow function properties to private methods for consistency. Overall, excellent work!
- Pass everything parameter from run() to runByType() - Update runByType to use everything to bypass caching logic - When everything=true, forces runByType to execute even if previousColoringMethod matches and colorsDirty is false Addresses PR review feedback about missing parameter propagation
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request is a great refactoring that improves the design of the base Modifier class by making the run() method abstract. This enforces a clear contract for all modifier subclasses and improves type safety. The changes across the different modifier implementations correctly adapt to this new design. I've added a few suggestions to further improve consistency and code clarity, mainly regarding the use of the new everything parameter in some of the modifiers.
- Pass everything parameter to runByProperty in ColorModifier for consistency - Update runByProperty signature to accept everything parameter - Prefix unused everything parameters with underscore in SyncBondsModifier and SyncParticlesModifier to signal intentional non-use Addresses medium-priority review feedback
|
/gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request successfully refactors the base Modifier class by making the run() method abstract, which improves the API contract and type safety for all subclasses. The changes in the subclasses correctly adapt to this new design. I've pointed out a potential issue in ColorModifier where a parameter seems to be unused, and suggested a minor improvement for consistency and encapsulation in the same file. Overall, this is a great improvement to the codebase.
| runByProperty = ( | ||
| input: ModifierInput, | ||
| output: ModifierOutput, | ||
| everything: boolean = false, | ||
| ) => { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
| run( | ||
| input: ModifierInput, | ||
| output: ModifierOutput, | ||
| everything: boolean = false, | ||
| ): void { | ||
| if (this.computeName) { | ||
| this.runByProperty(input, output); | ||
| this.runByProperty(input, output, everything); | ||
| } else { | ||
| this.runByType(input, output); | ||
| this.runByType(input, output, everything); | ||
| } | ||
| }; | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary
Fixes #187
Improves the base
Modifierclass design by making therun()method abstract, ensuring that subclasses must implement it and providing better TypeScript type safety.Changes
run()method abstract in the baseModifierclassrun()Benefits
run()methodThis pull request contains changes generated by a Cursor Cloud Agent