Skip to content

fix: bump alloy to 0.15 #199

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
May 12, 2025
Merged

fix: bump alloy to 0.15 #199

merged 22 commits into from
May 12, 2025

Conversation

zerosnacks
Copy link
Member

@zerosnacks zerosnacks commented Mar 18, 2025

Motivation

Updates:

Added follow-up ticket here: #217

PR Checklist

  • Added Documentation
  • Breaking changes

@zerosnacks zerosnacks changed the title fix: ci build fix: bump alloy + bump revm + fix ci build May 8, 2025
@zerosnacks zerosnacks self-assigned this May 8, 2025
@zerosnacks zerosnacks changed the title fix: bump alloy + bump revm + fix ci build fix: bump alloy to 0.15 May 9, 2025
@zerosnacks zerosnacks marked this pull request as ready for review May 9, 2025 08:41
@zerosnacks zerosnacks requested a review from yash-atreya as a code owner May 9, 2025 08:41
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ async fn main() -> Result<()> {

// Create a provider with both signers pointing to anvil
let rpc_url = anvil.endpoint_url();
let provider = ProviderBuilder::new().wallet(wallet).on_http(rpc_url);
let provider = ProviderBuilder::new().wallet(wallet).connect_http(rpc_url);
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seeing a

Sent approval: 0x93426765c406ba149df94b52df30b415bc812b7d384dbcaafb9a389a4eec3555
Error: server returned an error response: error code 3: execution reverted, data: "0x"

Does not appear to be a regression as it also appears on main

Still worth looking into

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Adding to the ignore list in run.sh for now

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added follow-up ticket for it here: #218

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this to Reviewed in Alloy May 9, 2025
Comment on lines +23 to +27
reth-db = { git = "https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth", package = "reth-db", rev = "55f4b0b" }
reth-provider = { git = "https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth", package = "reth-provider", rev = "55f4b0b" }
reth-node-types = { git = "https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth", package = "reth-node-types", rev = "55f4b0b" }
reth-chainspec = { git = "https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth", package = "reth-chainspec", rev = "55f4b0b" }
reth-node-ethereum = { git = "https://github.com/paradigmxyz/reth", package = "reth-node-ethereum", rev = "55f4b0b" }
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

we could also move this entirely to reth and just reference it here

@zerosnacks
Copy link
Member Author

lgtm! @yash-atreya

providers::{Provider, ProviderBuilder},
rpc::types::TransactionRequest,
};
use alloy_evm::{eth::EthEvmContext, EthEvm, Evm};
Copy link
Member Author

@zerosnacks zerosnacks May 12, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯!

@yash-atreya yash-atreya merged commit 5eb9b3a into main May 12, 2025
4 checks passed
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Reviewed to Done in Alloy May 12, 2025
@zerosnacks zerosnacks deleted the zerosnacks/fix-ci-build branch May 12, 2025 17:34
@grandizzy grandizzy moved this from Done to Completed in Alloy May 20, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: Completed
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants