Skip to content

Add Guard Core JVM to Security - #1356

Open
rennf93 wants to merge 1 commit into
akullpp:mainfrom
rennf93:add-guard-core-jvm
Open

rennf93 wants to merge 1 commit into
akullpp:mainfrom
rennf93:add-guard-core-jvm

Conversation

@rennf93

@rennf93 rennf93 commented Oct 16, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Suggestion type

  • Project
  • Resource

Checklist

  • I searched the list and existing issues for duplicates.
  • I changed README_SOURCE.md, not the generated README.md.
  • This pull request contains one suggestion.
  • The suggestion is relevant to Java or the JVM and fits its chosen category.
  • I used the canonical project or resource link.
  • The suggestion is current and maintained.
  • The concise, neutral description explains its distinguishing value and ends with punctuation.
  • Licensing is clear and any restrictive terms are disclosed where applicable.

I'm the author. Guard Core JVM is a framework-free request security engine published to Maven Central (com.guard-core:guard-core, latest 4.4.0) with Spring Boot and Ktor adapters. Its distinguishing value is that it runs the same detection rules and shares the same Redis rate-limit and ban state as the project's Python, Go, Rust, PHP and TypeScript engines, so a mixed-language fleet enforces one policy.


Summary by cubic

Adds Guard Core JVM to the Security libraries section of README_SOURCE.md.

The entry highlights that it runs the same detection rules and shares Redis rate-limit and ban state as the project's Python, Go, Rust, PHP, and TypeScript engines, so a mixed-language fleet enforces one consistent policy.

Written for commit 904d657. Summary will update on new commits.

View guided diff

Project background: Guard Core's first library is fastapi-guard, public since August 2024 (first PyPI release, 0.1.0, on 2024-08-26). It has 825 GitHub stars, 65 releases and about 62,000 PyPI downloads in the last month (pypistats.org). The framework-agnostic engines and the adapters for other frameworks and languages came later and run the same detection rules, checked in CI against shared conformance fixtures.

@cubic-dev-ai cubic-dev-ai Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No issues found across 1 file

View guided diff | Re-trigger cubic

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant