Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

just updating the logging logic for missing preferences #4085

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 14, 2024

Conversation

Baalmart
Copy link
Contributor

@Baalmart Baalmart commented Dec 14, 2024

Description

just updating the logging logic for missing preferences

Changes Made

  • just updating the logging logic for missing preferences

Testing

  • Tested locally
  • Tested against staging environment
  • Relevant tests passed: [List test names]

Affected Services

  • Which services were modified:
    • Auth Service

API Documentation Updated?

  • Yes, API documentation was updated
  • No, API documentation does not need updating

Additional Notes

just updating the logging logic for missing preferences

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved logging clarity for user preference processing, providing more specific messages based on user data conditions.
  • New Features

    • Introduced conditional logging for users without customized locations, enhancing feedback for user preference processing.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 14, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request focuses on refining the logging mechanism within the preferences-log-job.js file, specifically enhancing the logUserPreferences function. The changes introduce more nuanced and contextual logging output, providing clearer insights into user preference processing. The modifications aim to improve log readability by conditionally reporting user location customization statistics and clarifying messaging for different processing scenarios.

Changes

File Change Summary
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js Updated logging logic to conditionally log user preference processing details, including percentage of users without customized locations and more precise messaging for different processing scenarios

Suggested Reviewers

  • OchiengPaul442

Possibly Related PRs

Poem

🔍 Logs dancing with precision clear,
Revealing secrets both far and near
User preferences, now brightly shown
In messages elegantly grown
A tale of data, softly told 📊

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. This feature will be included in our Pro Plan when released.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 11.81%. Comparing base (35ac06e) to head (7ed3e36).

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           staging    #4085   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    11.81%   11.81%           
========================================
  Files          115      115           
  Lines        15485    15485           
  Branches       319      319           
========================================
  Hits          1829     1829           
  Misses       13656    13656           

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js (1)

80-86: LGTM! Consider extracting the percentage calculation to a constant.

The conditional logging provides clear and distinct messages for different scenarios, making it easier to understand the state of user preferences. The use of emojis also helps in quickly scanning logs.

Consider extracting the percentage calculation to improve readability:

+ const PERCENTAGE_MULTIPLIER = 100;
  if (totalUsersProcessed > 0) {
    const percentageWithoutSelectedSites = (
-     (totalCountWithoutSelectedSites / totalUsersProcessed) * 100
+     (totalCountWithoutSelectedSites / totalUsersProcessed) * PERCENTAGE_MULTIPLIER
    ).toFixed(2);
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 35ac06e and 7ed3e36.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js (1)

89-89: Verify if the message covers all possible scenarios.

The message now clearly indicates two possible scenarios (no users processed or no users in the default group), which is more informative than the previous version.

Let's verify if these are indeed the only two scenarios that could lead to this message:

✅ Verification successful

The message accurately reflects all possible scenarios

After analyzing the complete implementation, the message is correct and comprehensive. The totalUsersProcessed can be 0 in exactly two scenarios:

  1. No users were found in the database (when initial users.length === 0)
  2. Users exist but none belong to the default group (when validUsers filtering results in empty array)

The message "No users processed or no users belong to the default group" precisely captures both these cases.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Search for conditions that lead to totalUsersProcessed being 0

# Look for early returns or conditions that might affect user processing
rg -A 5 "totalUsersProcessed = 0|totalUsersProcessed =" --type js

# Look for conditions that might skip user processing
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($condition) { 
  $$$
  continue;
  $$$
}'

Length of output: 592


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's look at the entire function context to understand all scenarios
rg -B 10 -A 20 "totalUsersProcessed = 0" src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js

# Also search for any return statements or conditions that might affect processing
ast-grep --pattern 'if ($condition) {
  $$$
  return $_;
  $$$
}'

# Look for any while or for loops that process users
ast-grep --pattern 'while ($condition) {
  $$$
  totalUsersProcessed$$$
}'

Length of output: 1068


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's see the complete file to understand the full context
cat src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js

# Also look for any error conditions that might affect processing
rg -B 5 -A 5 "catch|throw" src/auth-service/bin/jobs/preferences-log-job.js

Length of output: 3709

Copy link
Contributor

Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here

@Baalmart Baalmart merged commit a9e0110 into staging Dec 14, 2024
52 checks passed
@Baalmart Baalmart deleted the correct-logger-preferences branch December 14, 2024 21:30
@Baalmart Baalmart mentioned this pull request Dec 14, 2024
1 task
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant