consider removal of duplicates of all fields and not just selected_sites #4074
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@Baalmart has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 4 minutes and 10 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
📝 Walkthrough📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe changes in this pull request primarily focus on the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
src/auth-service/utils/create-preference.js (1)
Line range hint
1-24: Consider architectural improvements for preference managementTo enhance maintainability and consistency, consider:
- Creating a middleware to handle duplicate removal across all routes
- Implementing a validation layer using a schema validation library
- Centralizing error handling logic to ensure consistent responses
This would reduce code duplication and ensure consistent behavior across all preference-related operations.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/auth-service/utils/create-preference.js(3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
src/auth-service/utils/create-preference.js (2)
79-82: LGTM: Consistent duplicate removal across all fields
The simplified approach of applying removeDuplicates uniformly to all array fields improves code consistency and maintainability while fulfilling the PR's objective.
96-97: LGTM: Consistent handling of duplicates in timestamped fields
The uniform application of removeDuplicates to fields with timestamps maintains consistency while preserving the createdAt functionality.
| // const update = prepareUpdate(body, fieldsToUpdate, fieldsToAddToSet); | ||
| const update = body; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Critical: Bypassing duplicate removal in replace method
The direct assignment of body to update bypasses the prepareUpdate function, which:
- Contradicts the PR's objective of handling duplicates across all fields
- Skips important field processing and validation
- Could lead to data inconsistency
Restore the duplicate removal functionality by applying this diff:
-// const update = prepareUpdate(body, fieldsToUpdate, fieldsToAddToSet);
-const update = body;
+const update = prepareUpdate(body, fieldsToUpdate, fieldsToAddToSet);📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| // const update = prepareUpdate(body, fieldsToUpdate, fieldsToAddToSet); | |
| const update = body; | |
| const update = prepareUpdate(body, fieldsToUpdate, fieldsToAddToSet); |
|
Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## staging #4074 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 11.81% 11.81%
========================================
Files 115 115
Lines 15482 15482
Branches 319 319
========================================
Hits 1829 1829
Misses 13653 13653 |
|
Auth-service changes in this PR available for preview here |
Description
consider removal of duplicates of all fields and not just selected_sites
Changes Made
Testing
Affected Services
Endpoints Ready for Testing
API Documentation Updated?
Additional Notes
consider removal of duplicates of all fields and not just selected_sites
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes