Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update/integration iqair devices #3964

Conversation

NicholasTurner23
Copy link
Contributor

@NicholasTurner23 NicholasTurner23 commented Dec 2, 2024

Description

Just adding missing columns.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a new network field to the measurements schema, allowing for the inclusion of network-related data.
    • Introduced a default value for the "network" column in weather data processing.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved clarity in data cleaning methods, enhancing overall data handling without changing core functionalities.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 2, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request involve updates to three main files related to data processing and schema definition. Modifications include simplifying the assignment syntax in the clean_bam_data method, the addition of a new network field to the JSON schema for measurements, and the introduction of a default value for the network column in the transform_raw_data method. These updates aim to enhance code clarity and accommodate new data attributes while maintaining existing functionalities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py - Simplified tenant column assignment in clean_bam_data.
- Removed commented-out status filter.
- Added comment for structured data quality checks in clean_low_cost_sensor_data.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/schema/measurements.json - Added new field network (type: STRING, mode: NULLABLE) to the JSON schema.
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/weather_data_utils.py - Set default value "airqo" for the network column in transform_raw_data.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • Baalmart
  • OchiengPaul442

🎉 In the realm of data, changes take flight,
With a new field added, our schema shines bright.
Simplified code, clarity's gain,
In the world of air quality, we’ll never be plain.
So here's to the updates, both clever and neat,
Enhancing our workflow, making it sweet! 🌟


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/schema/measurements.json (1)

7-11: Consider adding a description for the network field

The new network field would benefit from a description field explaining its purpose and possible values (e.g., "airqo", "iqair"), similar to other fields in the schema.

   {
     "name": "network",
     "type": "STRING",
-    "mode": "NULLABLE"
+    "mode": "NULLABLE",
+    "description": "Identifies the network/platform source of the measurements (e.g., 'airqo', 'iqair')"
   },
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/weather_data_utils.py (1)

137-138: Address the TODO comment with a more structured approach

The TODO comment suggests this needs cleanup. Consider moving the network assignment to a configuration file or making it more dynamic based on the data source.

-        # TODO Clean this up.
-        data["network"] = "airqo"
+        # Set default network value from configuration
+        data["network"] = configuration.DEFAULT_NETWORK
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9b85b34 and f09bb86.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py (1 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/schema/measurements.json (2 hunks)
  • src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/weather_data_utils.py (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/workflows/airqo_etl_utils/airqo_utils.py (1)

710-710: LGTM: Improved code readability

The simplified pandas assignment syntax is more readable while maintaining the same functionality. This change aligns with modern pandas best practices.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants