Skip to content

Conversation

@alex-aipolabs
Copy link
Contributor

@alex-aipolabs alex-aipolabs commented Jun 16, 2025

🏷️ Ticket

notion

📝 Description

[Describe your changes in detail (optional if the issue you linked already contains a
detail description of the change)]

🎥 Demo (if applicable)

📸 Screenshots (if applicable)

✅ Checklist

  • I have signed the Contributor License Agreement (CLA) and read the contributing guide (required)
  • I have linked this PR to an issue or a ticket (required)
  • I have updated the documentation related to my change if needed
  • I have updated the tests accordingly (required for a bug fix or a new feature)
  • All checks on CI passed

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Enforced a maximum limit on the number of functions returned by search, ensuring users cannot request more than the configured cap.
  • Tests
    • Added tests to verify that the search results are properly capped at the maximum allowed limit.

@vercel
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 16, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
aci-dev-portal ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 16, 2025 1:56pm

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jun 16, 2025

Walkthrough

The changes introduce a configurable upper limit for function search results. The hardcoded upper bound on the limit parameter is removed from the schema and instead enforced at runtime using a new configuration constant. Corresponding logic is updated in the route handler, and a parameterized test is added to verify the cap.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
backend/aci/common/schemas/function.py Removed upper bound (le=1000) from limit field in FunctionsSearch schema.
backend/aci/server/config.py Added MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT constant set to 1000.
backend/aci/server/routes/functions.py Enforced limit cap at runtime using config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT in function search route.
backend/aci/server/tests/routes/functions/test_functions_search.py Added parameterized test to verify the enforced maximum search limit.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant API_Server
    participant Config
    participant CRUD

    Client->>API_Server: search_functions(limit=N)
    API_Server->>Config: Get MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT
    API_Server->>API_Server: limit = min(N, MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT)
    API_Server->>CRUD: search_functions(limit)
    CRUD-->>API_Server: functions[]
    API_Server-->>Client: functions[] (length ≤ MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT)
Loading

Poem

In the garden of code, a limit did grow,
But now it's set free—well, as high as config will go!
The schema's unbound, but the server keeps guard,
Tests hop in to check that no limits are marred.
A rabbit approves, with a twitch of its nose,
For caps set in config—just how it goes!
🐇

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Explain this complex logic.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
backend/aci/server/config.py (1)

84-86: Consider making the cap configurable via env var instead of a hard-coded literal

A static MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT = 1000 works, but it forces a code change + deploy for any future tuning.
Expose the value through check_and_get_env_variable("SERVER_MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT", default=1000) (or analogous helper) and default to 1000 when the env var is absent.

-# Search limits
-MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT = 1000
+# Search limits
+MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT = int(
+    check_and_get_env_variable("SERVER_MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT", default="1000")
+)

This stays backward-compatible while providing runtime flexibility.

backend/aci/common/schemas/function.py (1)

127-128: Schema now advertises “unbounded” limit—consider aligning docs with runtime cap

The le=1000 constraint was removed, but the route still caps results at config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT. Without an upper bound in the schema, OpenAPI docs will suggest any integer ≥ 1 is acceptable, which might confuse API consumers.

Two lightweight options:

  1. Re-add an upper bound tied to the config value (preferred for self-documentation):
-limit: int = Field(default=100, ge=1, description="Maximum number of Functions per response.")
+limit: int = Field(
+    default=100,
+    ge=1,
+    le=config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT,
+    description=f"Maximum number of Functions per response "
+    f"(<= {config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT}).",
+)
  1. Update the field’s description to explicitly mention the 1000-item cap.

Either keeps validation + docs in sync with runtime behaviour.

backend/aci/server/tests/routes/functions/test_functions_search.py (1)

568-589: Nice coverage for the new cap

The test correctly patches config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT and asserts the cap is enforced across all formats. Solid addition. One nit: if any downstream module imported the constant with from ...config import MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT, the patch would not affect it. That isn’t the case today, but consider patching those symbols explicitly or switching to monkeypatch.setattr if such imports appear later.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8951b83 and 32e1bdc.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • backend/aci/common/schemas/function.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/aci/server/config.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/aci/server/routes/functions.py (1 hunks)
  • backend/aci/server/tests/routes/functions/test_functions_search.py (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
backend/aci/server/tests/routes/functions/test_functions_search.py (3)
backend/aci/common/enums.py (1)
  • FunctionDefinitionFormat (73-81)
backend/aci/server/tests/conftest.py (3)
  • test_client (119-124)
  • dummy_functions (277-281)
  • dummy_api_key_1 (162-163)
backend/aci/common/schemas/function.py (1)
  • FunctionsSearch (110-142)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (3)
  • GitHub Check: Format & Lint
  • GitHub Check: Compose Tests
  • GitHub Check: Format, Lint, and Test
🔇 Additional comments (1)
backend/aci/server/routes/functions.py (1)

107-115: Capping logic looks correct

Using min(query_params.limit, config.MAX_FUNCTIONS_SEARCH_LIMIT) cleanly enforces the server-side cap and keeps the caller’s requested offset.
No further issues spotted here.

@recurseml
Copy link

recurseml bot commented Jul 14, 2025

✨ No issues found! Your code is sparkling clean! ✨

Need help? Join our Discord for support!
https://discord.gg/qEjHQk64Z9

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants