Skip to content

Conversation

@kangclzjc
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Currently we do the certificate generation ourselves. If they already have certificate in their system, we should manage external existing certificate by mounting them

What this PR does / why we need it:

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a API change?


Additional documentation e.g., enhancement proposals, usage docs, etc.:


Signed-off-by: kangclzjc <[email protected]>
// If set to false, you must provide your own certificates via Secret.
// Default: true
// +optional
AutoProvision *bool `json:"autoProvision,omitempty"`
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hmm... maybe just default to auto provision in the code if SecretName isn't set, then the user doesn't have to remember to disable and we don't need to track this variable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants