Skip to content

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been...

Unreviewed Published Apr 28, 2024 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Apr 28, 2024

Package

No package listedSuggest a package

Affected versions

Unknown

Patched versions

Unknown

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

net/sched: taprio: avoid disabling offload when it was never enabled

In an incredibly strange API design decision, qdisc->destroy() gets
called even if qdisc->init() never succeeded, not exclusively since
commit 87b60cfacf9f ("net_sched: fix error recovery at qdisc creation"),
but apparently also earlier (in the case of qdisc_create_dflt()).

The taprio qdisc does not fully acknowledge this when it attempts full
offload, because it starts off with q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID in
taprio_init(), then it replaces q->flags with TCA_TAPRIO_ATTR_FLAGS
parsed from netlink (in taprio_change(), tail called from taprio_init()).

But in taprio_destroy(), we call taprio_disable_offload(), and this
determines what to do based on FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED(q->flags).

But looking at the implementation of FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED()
(a bitwise check of bit 1 in q->flags), it is invalid to call this macro
on q->flags when it contains TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, because that is set
to U32_MAX, and therefore FULL_OFFLOAD_IS_ENABLED() will return true on
an invalid set of flags.

As a result, it is possible to crash the kernel if user space forces an
error between setting q->flags = TAPRIO_FLAGS_INVALID, and the calling
of taprio_enable_offload(). This is because drivers do not expect the
offload to be disabled when it was never enabled.

The error that we force here is to attach taprio as a non-root qdisc,
but instead as child of an mqprio root qdisc:

$ tc qdisc add dev swp0 root handle 1:
mqprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 hw 0
$ tc qdisc replace dev swp0 parent 1:1
taprio num_tc 8 map 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
queues 1@0 1@1 1@2 1@3 1@4 1@5 1@6 1@7 base-time 0
sched-entry S 0x7f 990000 sched-entry S 0x80 100000
flags 0x0 clockid CLOCK_TAI
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffffffffffffff8
[fffffffffffffff8] pgd=0000000000000000, p4d=0000000000000000
Internal error: Oops: 96000004 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
Call trace:
taprio_dump+0x27c/0x310
vsc9959_port_setup_tc+0x1f4/0x460
felix_port_setup_tc+0x24/0x3c
dsa_slave_setup_tc+0x54/0x27c
taprio_disable_offload.isra.0+0x58/0xe0
taprio_destroy+0x80/0x104
qdisc_create+0x240/0x470
tc_modify_qdisc+0x1fc/0x6b0
rtnetlink_rcv_msg+0x12c/0x390
netlink_rcv_skb+0x5c/0x130
rtnetlink_rcv+0x1c/0x2c

Fix this by keeping track of the operations we made, and undo the
offload only if we actually did it.

I've added "bool offloaded" inside a 4 byte hole between "int clockid"
and "atomic64_t picos_per_byte". Now the first cache line looks like
below:

$ pahole -C taprio_sched net/sched/sch_taprio.o
struct taprio_sched {
struct Qdisc * * qdiscs; /* 0 8 /
struct Qdisc * root; /
8 8 /
u32 flags; /
16 4 /
enum tk_offsets tk_offset; /
20 4 /
int clockid; /
24 4 /
bool offloaded; /
28 1 */

    /* XXX 3 bytes hole, try to pack */

    atomic64_t                 picos_per_byte;       /*    32     0 */

    /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */

    spinlock_t                 current_entry_lock;   /*    40     0 */

    /* XXX 8 bytes hole, try to pack */

    struct sched_entry *       current_entry;        /*    48     8 */
    struct sched_gate_list *   oper_sched;           /*    56     8 */
    /* --- cacheline 1 boundary (64 bytes) --- */

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Apr 28, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 28, 2024
Last updated Apr 28, 2024

Severity

Unknown

Weaknesses

No CWEs

CVE ID

CVE-2022-48644

GHSA ID

GHSA-vr5f-5953-gfj5

Source code

No known source code

Dependabot alerts are not supported on this advisory because it does not have a package from a supported ecosystem with an affected and fixed version.

Learn more about GitHub language support

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.