Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Appknox starter workflow #2447

Merged
merged 10 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024
Merged

Add Appknox starter workflow #2447

merged 10 commits into from
Sep 10, 2024

Conversation

ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor

@ginilpg ginilpg commented Jul 4, 2024

Pre-requisites

  • Prior to submitting a new workflow, please apply to join the GitHub Technology Partner Program: partner.github.com/apply.

Please note that at this time we are only accepting new starter workflows for Code Scanning. Updates to existing starter workflows are fine.


Tasks

For all workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be contained in a .yml file with the language or platform as its filename, in lower, kebab-cased format (for example, docker-image.yml). Special characters should be removed or replaced with words as appropriate (for example, "dotnet" instead of ".NET").
  • [x ] Should use sentence case for the names of workflows and steps (for example, "Run tests").
  • Should be named only by the name of the language or platform (for example, "Go", not "Go CI" or "Go Build").
  • Should include comments in the workflow for any parts that are not obvious or could use clarification.
  • Should specify least privileged permissions for GITHUB_TOKEN so that the workflow runs successfully.

For CI workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be preserved under the ci directory.
  • Should include a matching ci/properties/*.properties.json file (for example, ci/properties/docker-publish.properties.json).
  • Should run on push to branches: [ $default-branch ] and pull_request to branches: [ $default-branch ].
  • Packaging workflows should run on release with types: [ created ].
  • Publishing workflows should have a filename that is the name of the language or platform, in lower case, followed by "-publish" (for example, docker-publish.yml).

For Code Scanning workflows, the workflow:

  • Should be preserved under the code-scanning directory.
  • Should include a matching code-scanning/properties/*.properties.json file (for example, code-scanning/properties/codeql.properties.json), with properties set as follows:
    • name: Name of the Code Scanning integration.
    • creator: Name of the organization/user producing the Code Scanning integration.
    • description: Short description of the Code Scanning integration.
    • categories: Array of languages supported by the Code Scanning integration.
    • iconName: Name of the SVG logo representing the Code Scanning integration. This SVG logo must be present in the icons directory.
  • Should run on push to branches: [ $default-branch, $protected-branches ] and pull_request to branches: [ $default-branch ]. We also recommend a schedule trigger of cron: $cron-weekly (for example, codeql.yml).

Some general notes:

  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by GitHub, in the actions organization, or
  • This workflow must only use actions that are produced by the language or ecosystem that the workflow supports. These actions must be published to the GitHub Marketplace. We require that these actions be referenced using the full 40 character hash of the action's commit instead of a tag. Additionally, workflows must include the following comment at the top of the workflow file:
    # This workflow uses actions that are not certified by GitHub.
    # They are provided by a third-party and are governed by
    # separate terms of service, privacy policy, and support
    # documentation.
    
  • Automation and CI workflows should not send data to any 3rd party service except for the purposes of installing dependencies.
  • Automation and CI workflows cannot be dependent on a paid service or product.

@ginilpg ginilpg requested review from a team as code owners July 4, 2024 10:08
@github-actions github-actions bot added the code-scanning Related to workflows that show on the Code Scanning setup page label Jul 4, 2024
@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Jul 21, 2024

@nickfyson Could you please assist us with the merging process? It has been pending for almost a month. Thank you

Copy link
Contributor

@alexisabril alexisabril left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @ginilpg for the PR! The only request I noted was for a hash to the requested Action.

run: ./gradlew build # Update this to build your Android or iOS application

- name: Appknox GitHub action
uses: appknox/[email protected]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would you be able to provide the hash instead of the version for this Action?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@alexisabril I have added the hash here. Please verify.

@ginilpg ginilpg requested a review from alexisabril July 23, 2024 03:27
@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Jul 30, 2024

@alexisabril We have addressed the review comment you provided. Could you please reverify the changes?

@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Aug 13, 2024

@alexisabril Could you please assist us with the merging process here?

@subho007
Copy link

@alexisabril let us know if there is any more changes required ?

@alexisabril
Copy link
Contributor

Hi folks, taking a look at this PR it looks as if there might be a formatting issue in the yml for this action.

ginilpg

This comment was marked as outdated.

@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Aug 23, 2024

Hi folks, taking a look at this PR it looks as if there might be a formatting issue in the yml for this action.

@alexisabril Formatting issues has been fixed. Could you please verify the changes?

@alexisabril alexisabril self-requested a review August 26, 2024 16:15
@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Aug 29, 2024

@alexisabril Could you assist us with the next steps here? Looks like the workflow needs your approval to run

@subho007
Copy link

subho007 commented Sep 2, 2024

Hi @alexisabril, thank you for taking the time to review the PR. Could you please let us know when we can proceed with going live?

@alexisabril
Copy link
Contributor

Hi folks, it appears this PR just needs to be updated at this point.

@subho007
Copy link

subho007 commented Sep 8, 2024

@ginilpg can you rebase and update the branch?

@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Sep 9, 2024

Hi folks, it appears this PR just needs to be updated at this point.

@alexisabril The PR has been updated

@alexisabril alexisabril merged commit 9db23a2 into actions:main Sep 10, 2024
2 checks passed
@ginilpg
Copy link
Contributor Author

ginilpg commented Sep 11, 2024

@alexisabril Thanks for merging the PR. We noticed that the 'Code Scanning' category is missing under workflows now. Can we add the 'Security' also as a category along with code scanning? Additionally, I realised we missed removing the 'preview' label from the properties.json file, so I've created a new PR to address that as well. Apologies for the back and forth iterations

ginilpg added a commit to ginilpg/starter-workflows that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Create appknox.json

Create appknox.svg

Update appknox.json

Update appknox.svg

Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.properties.json

Formatting yml

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Add Appknox starter workflow (actions#2447)

* Added appknox.yml for code scanning

* Create appknox.json

* Create appknox.svg

* Update appknox.json

* Update appknox.svg

* Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.properties.json

* Formatting yml

removed preview mode

removed preview mode

precommit lint
ginilpg added a commit to ginilpg/starter-workflows that referenced this pull request Sep 13, 2024
Create appknox.json

Create appknox.svg

Update appknox.json

Update appknox.svg

Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.properties.json

Formatting yml

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Add Appknox starter workflow (actions#2447)

* Added appknox.yml for code scanning

* Create appknox.json

* Create appknox.svg

* Update appknox.json

* Update appknox.svg

* Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.properties.json

* Formatting yml

removed preview mode

removed preview mode

precommit lint
alexisabril pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 17, 2024
Create appknox.json

Create appknox.svg

Update appknox.json

Update appknox.svg

Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.yml

Update appknox.properties.json

Formatting yml

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Removed preview mode from appknox scanner

Add Appknox starter workflow (#2447)

* Added appknox.yml for code scanning

* Create appknox.json

* Create appknox.svg

* Update appknox.json

* Update appknox.svg

* Rename appknox.json to appknox.properties.json

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.yml

* Update appknox.properties.json

* Formatting yml

removed preview mode

removed preview mode

precommit lint
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
code-scanning Related to workflows that show on the Code Scanning setup page new workflow
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants