-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
WCM-3: add include logic to webhooks #862
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
8 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
7fa4382
WCM-3: add include logic for webhooks
Sinnaj94 c4d0041
WCM-3: add changelog
Sinnaj94 03dc4fa
WCM-3: add tests for webhook
Sinnaj94 ef2bb57
WCM-3: add support for multiple webhooks
Sinnaj94 f6dd855
WCM-3: add test for multiple webhooks with same id
Sinnaj94 73efc4c
WCM-3: use dictionary for webhooks instead of OrderedDict
Sinnaj94 06fbd1e
WCM-3: add unit test for include and exclude weights
Sinnaj94 709a3dd
WCM-3: remove unnecessary webhook in config
Sinnaj94 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1 @@ | ||
WCM-3: add e-paper publish webhook |
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dies soll der Fall
exclude
gewinnt gegeninclude
sein, so wie in Zeile 244ff, richtig? Das ist sehr implizit. Ich schlage vor, einmal einen Testtest_exclude_takes_precedence_over_include
hinzuzufügen. Es gibt bisher auch keinen simplen<include>
Test, analog zu den Tests, die in derWebhookExcludeTest
Klasse drin sind.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
benötigen wir diesen Erweiterung der Config noch, nachdem wir die
WebhookExcludeStrongerThanIncludeTest
oben haben? Der Context hier sind ja die Events, ob irgendwas wegen der In-/Exclude-Bedingung rausfliegt, ist nebensächlich.