Fix accessibility of the hooked blocks toggles #63133
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
afercia
added
[Type] Bug
|
Size Change: -51 B (0%) Total Size: 1.77 MB
ℹ️ View Unchanged
|
afercia
force-pushed
the
fix/block-hooks-toggls
branch
from
e9d67a9 to
f2ca994
Compare
|
The following accounts have interacted with this PR and/or linked issues. I will continue to update these lists as activity occurs. You can also manually ask me to refresh this list by adding the If you're merging code through a pull request on GitHub, copy and paste the following into the bottom of the merge commit message. To understand the WordPress project's expectations around crediting contributors, please review the Contributor Attribution page in the Core Handbook. |
|
I'm not sure I agree with the removal of icons here; I think that a) icons don't need to be unique if they are supplemental to visible text, and b) icons can be useful references in supporting people with low literacy in the UI language or with cognitive impairments. The argument that the magnifying glass + the text "search" is going to imply that this will perform a search any more than the word "search" does by itself seems specious; the context should provide sufficient clarity there. The change of order is good; but I'm not totally bought in to the argument that the icons need to be removed to make this happen. |
afercia
force-pushed
the
fix/block-hooks-toggls
branch
from
f2ca994 to
6b8ed15
Compare
|
Flaky tests detected in 6b8ed15. 🔍 Workflow run URL: https://github.com/WordPress/gutenberg/actions/runs/10576803424
|
@joedolson I see a point in keeping the icons. Some UIs, for example menus, certainly benefit from using both icons and visible text labels. However, this specific UI is a little different. The toggles need to be on the left. At that point, I'm not sure there's any good spot where the icons can be placed into. The visuals of toggle + icon + visible label wouldn't great, as illustrated in the screenshot below:
|
|
In absence of a new design I'm inclined to merge this PR. @WordPress/gutenberg-design If you have a chance to provide a new design soon that would be welcomed, thanks. The key part is:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #63094
What?
The hooked block toggles aren't accessible, as the visual order and DOM order mismatch.
Additionally, base component should not be overridden with local, ad-hoc custom implementations.
Why?
VIsual order and DOM order must match, when the order affects meaning, oerability and interaction.
Base component should not be overridden: they are designed and tested to provide as much aaccessibility as possible and consistent design.
How?
flex-direction: row-reverseCSS property that was used to swap the toggle and label position.Testing Instructions
Testing Instructions for Keyboard
Screenshots or screencast
Before and after: