-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reveal block boundaries on hover in the Site Editor #27271
Merged
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
51e6acd
Reveal block boundaries on hover, and colorise template parts
jameskoster 855042c
Hover boundary width
jameskoster d09dc61
Remove focus and selected styles
jameskoster 316c20e
Merge branch 'master' into try/block-selection
jameskoster cfcad79
fix clipping issue and better align hover outline
jameskoster 10e1974
Apply 1px black border when selected, but not focussed
jameskoster bfb8507
Default cursor on hover
jameskoster fa73c88
Only hide the outline on text editable blocks whilst typing
jameskoster 4d3847b
outline alignment
jameskoster f547f3c
Merge branch 'master' into try/block-selection
jameskoster ee94f0d
Even more alignment fixes...
jameskoster cf9687c
Merge branch 'master' into try/block-selection
jameskoster b47f73b
Remove the pseudo-spotlight effect on template parts
jameskoster e208848
Merge branch 'master' into try/block-selection
jameskoster 1561108
Merge branch 'master' into try/block-selection
jameskoster 072db8f
Remove template part spotlight and move outline styles
jameskoster File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ | |
|
||
// Active entity spotlight. | ||
&.has-active-entity:not(.is-focus-mode) { | ||
opacity: 0.5; | ||
//opacity: 0.5; | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably need to remove this when this PR goes out of draft state. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Probably 😅 |
||
transition: opacity 0.1s linear; | ||
@include reduce-motion("transition"); | ||
|
||
|
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If we are removing the template part spotlight mode thingy, we can probably remove this class entry altogether