Fix compilation issue by updating package management to pnpm #79
Conversation
Fixes #71 Unexpected error. Please try again in some time --- For more details, open the [Copilot Workspace session](https://copilot-workspace.githubnext.com/VishwamAI/jobcity/issues/71?shareId=XXXX-XXXX-XXXX-XXXX).
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@devin-ai-integration[bot] has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 2 minutes and 37 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications to the CI workflow files to enhance testing capabilities for both frontend and backend applications. Key changes include the addition of steps for setting up Node.js, installing the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 8
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (13)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (5)
29-32: Add error handling and lock file verification.The current implementation lacks proper error handling and lock file verification.
Apply this diff:
- name: Install frontend dependencies run: | + if [ ! -d "frontend" ]; then + echo "Error: frontend directory not found" + exit 1 + fi cd frontend + if [ ! -f "pnpm-lock.yaml" ]; then + echo "Error: pnpm-lock.yaml not found" + exit 1 + fi pnpm install
33-36: Enhance CI test configuration and artifact collection.The test step could benefit from CI-specific configurations and test result preservation.
Apply this diff:
- name: Run frontend tests run: | cd frontend - pnpm test + pnpm test --ci --coverage + - name: Upload test results + if: always() + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + with: + name: frontend-test-results + path: frontend/coverage
37-37: Align backend test configuration with frontend improvements.For consistency and better CI reporting, the backend tests should follow similar patterns as frontend tests.
Apply this diff:
- name: Run backend tests run: | cd backend - pytest -v + pytest -v --junitxml=test-results.xml --cov=. --cov-report=xml + - name: Upload test results + if: always() + uses: actions/upload-artifact@v3 + with: + name: backend-test-results + path: | + backend/test-results.xml + backend/coverage.xml
Line range hint
1-37: Add workflow timeouts and job dependencies.The workflow could benefit from some additional CI best practices:
- Add workflow timeout to prevent hung builds
- Configure job dependencies for better pipeline control
Add these configurations at the workflow level:
# Add at the top level run-name: CI - ${{ github.event_name }} by @${{ github.actor }} timeout-minutes: 30 # Modify the jobs section jobs: frontend: runs-on: ubuntu-latest timeout-minutes: 15 steps: # Frontend steps... backend: needs: frontend runs-on: ubuntu-latest timeout-minutes: 15 steps: # Backend steps...
Remove remaining npm artifacts and update frontend documentation
- Remove
backend/blockchain/package-lock.jsonas it conflicts with pnpm usage- Update npm/yarn references in
frontend/public/index.htmlto use pnpm instead- Fix circular references in
frontend/package.jsonwhere start/test scripts reference themselves🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-37: Verify resolution of npm compilation issues.While the switch to pnpm is a good solution, we should verify that all npm references are updated consistently across the codebase.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for any remaining npm references that might need updating echo "Searching for package.json files..." fd package.json echo "\nSearching for npm commands in documentation and scripts..." rg -i "npm (install|run|start|test)" --type-not yaml echo "\nChecking for npm lock files that should be removed..." fd "package-lock.json|npm-debug.log"Length of output: 1860
.github/workflows/test.yml (4)
Line range hint
1-1: Update workflow name to reflect both frontend and backend testingThe workflow name "Test Backend" is no longer accurate since the workflow now tests both frontend and backend.
-name: Test Backend +name: Test Frontend and Backend🧰 Tools
🪛 yamllint
[error] 26-26: trailing spaces
(trailing-spaces)
36-40: Improve frontend dependency installation reliabilityThe current setup could be enhanced with proper error handling and status checks.
- name: Install frontend dependencies run: | cd frontend - pnpm install + pnpm install --frozen-lockfile || (echo "Dependencies installation failed. Please ensure pnpm-lock.yaml is up to date." && exit 1)
41-44: Enhance frontend test execution configurationThe test execution step could benefit from:
- Using
working-directoryinstead ofcd- Adding CI-specific environment variables
- Ensuring proper test output capture
- name: Run frontend tests + working-directory: ./frontend + env: + CI: true run: | - cd frontend - pnpm test + pnpm test --ci --reporters=default --reporters=jest-junit
27-46: Consider splitting frontend and backend tests into parallel jobsTo optimize CI pipeline performance and maintain clear separation of concerns, consider restructuring the workflow to run frontend and backend tests in parallel.
Here's a suggested structure:
jobs: frontend-test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest defaults: run: working-directory: ./frontend steps: # Frontend specific steps backend-test: runs-on: ubuntu-latest defaults: run: working-directory: ./backend steps: # Backend specific steps.github/workflows/backend-ci.yml (2)
34-38: Consider separating frontend and backend CI workflowsWhile the integration works, mixing frontend and backend concerns in a single workflow reduces maintainability and violates the single responsibility principle. Consider:
- Creating a separate frontend CI workflow
- Using a composite workflow if both need to run together
- Pinning the Node.js version to a specific minor version (e.g., '18.17.0') for better reproducibility
- - name: Set up Node.js - uses: actions/setup-node@v3 - with: - node-version: '18.x' - cache: 'pnpm'
43-46: Improve workflow robustnessUse GitHub Actions' built-in
working-directoryto handle directory changes more reliably.- name: Install frontend dependencies - run: | - cd frontend - pnpm install + working-directory: frontend + run: pnpm installfrontend/package.json (2)
Line range hint
1-184: Consider documenting pnpm migration stepsTo help other contributors avoid similar issues, consider adding migration instructions to the repository documentation.
Would you like me to help create a migration guide that includes:
- Steps to clean up existing npm installation
- Instructions for installing and configuring pnpm
- Common troubleshooting steps
- Commands for verifying the setup
Scripts in package.json are causing an infinite recursion
The current scripts configuration in package.json will cause infinite recursion:
"start": "pnpm start"calls itself indefinitely"build": "pnpm build"calls itself indefinitely"test": "pnpm test"calls itself indefinitely"eject": "pnpm eject"calls itself indefinitelyThese scripts should instead call the actual underlying commands from Create React App. The scripts section should be updated to:
"scripts": { "start": "react-app-rewired start", "build": "react-app-rewired build", "test": "react-app-rewired test", "eject": "react-scripts eject", "lint": "eslint 'src/**/*.{js,jsx,ts,tsx}'", "type-check": "tsc --noEmit" }🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-184: Verify dependency compatibility with pnpmSince we're transitioning to pnpm, let's verify the dependency compatibility and installation process.
Let me gather more information about the webpack configuration and pnpm scripts to ensure compatibility.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify package.json configuration and dependencies # Test 1: Check if package.json is valid echo "Validating package.json..." if ! jq '.' frontend/package.json > /dev/null 2>&1; then echo "Error: Invalid package.json format" exit 1 fi # Test 2: Check for potential dependency conflicts echo "Checking for dependency conflicts..." rg -l "\"pnpm\"" --type json # Test 3: Look for any existing pnpm-lock.yaml echo "Checking for pnpm lock file..." fd -t f "pnpm-lock.yaml" # Test 4: Check for custom webpack configs that might need adjustment echo "Checking for webpack configurations..." fd -t f "webpack.config.js|config-overrides.js"Length of output: 555
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check webpack configuration and pnpm related setup # Check content of config-overrides.js echo "Content of config-overrides.js:" cat frontend/config-overrides.js # Check if there are any pnpm-specific configurations echo -e "\nChecking pnpm configurations in package.json files:" rg -A 5 "\"pnpm\"" --type json # Check for any custom build or start scripts that might need adjustment echo -e "\nChecking for custom build/start scripts:" rg "\"(start|build|test|eject)\":" --type json frontend/package.jsonLength of output: 1380
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
.github/workflows/backend-ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks).github/workflows/test.yml(1 hunks)INSTALLATION.md(0 hunks)frontend/README.md(2 hunks)frontend/package.json(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- INSTALLATION.md
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- frontend/README.md
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/ci.yml (3)
35-35: Pin pnpm version for reproducible builds.Using only the major version (8) may lead to unexpected behavior if pnpm releases breaking changes.
- version: 8 + version: 8.10.5
47-50: Enhance test execution reliability.The frontend test configuration could benefit from additional parameters to prevent hung builds and ensure proper error reporting.
- name: Run frontend tests run: | cd frontend - pnpm test -- --no-watch + pnpm test -- --no-watch --maxWorkers=2 --forceExit --detectOpenHandles --testTimeout=10000
39-40: Use working-directory instead of cd commands.Replace individual
cdcommands with GitHub Actions'working-directoryconfiguration for better maintainability.Example refactor:
- name: Install frontend dependencies + working-directory: frontend run: | - cd frontend pnpm install - name: Run backend tests + working-directory: backend run: | - cd backend python -m pytest tests/ - name: Run frontend tests + working-directory: frontend run: | - cd frontend pnpm test -- --no-watchAlso applies to: 44-45, 49-50
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
frontend/pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/ci.yml(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/ci.yml
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
17-17: the runner of "actions/setup-python@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
.github/workflows/ci.yml
Outdated
|
|
||
| jobs: | ||
| test: | ||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | ||
|
|
||
| steps: | ||
| - uses: actions/checkout@v2 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Update GitHub Actions to latest versions.
The workflow uses outdated versions of actions which may lack security updates and new features.
Apply these updates:
- - uses: actions/checkout@v2
+ - uses: actions/checkout@v4
- - uses: actions/setup-python@v2
+ - uses: actions/setup-python@v5Also applies to: 17-17
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
14-14: the runner of "actions/checkout@v2" action is too old to run on GitHub Actions. update the action's version to fix this issue
(action)
- Removed redundant workflow files - Consolidated CI/CD configuration into main.yml - Maintained Vercel deployment workflow - Updated Node.js and Python configurations - Added proper environment variables for tests - Improved caching configuration for both frontend and backend
- Added new main.yml workflow with improved configuration - Added pytest.ini with proper test configuration - Ensured proper environment variables for tests - Maintained compatibility with existing PR checks
Frontend Package Management Updates
Changes Made
Test Results
✅ Frontend dependencies install successfully with pnpm
✅ Production build completes without errors
✅ Frontend tests pass locally
✅ Installation process validated without Chrome/Chromium dependency
Technical Details
Fixed circular dependencies in package.json scripts:
Link to Devin run
https://preview.devin.ai/devin/79ca38b37cac40dd8b0dc0f4ba69c9b9
Related Issues
Fixes #71 (compilation steps)
Summary by CodeRabbit
Release Notes
New Features
INSTALLATION.mdto simplify prerequisites by removing the need for a Chrome/Chromium browser.frontend/README.mddetailing updated prerequisites and transitioning fromnpmtopnpmfor package management.Bug Fixes
Documentation
frontend/README.mdto reflect changes in project prerequisites and commands.