Bump WolverineFx from 6.34.0 to 6.35.0 - #564
Closed
dependabot[bot] wants to merge 1 commit into
Closed
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
Looks like WolverineFx is updatable in another way, so this is no longer needed. |
--- updated-dependencies: - dependency-name: WolverineFx dependency-version: 6.34.0 dependency-type: direct:production update-type: version-update:semver-minor ... Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
dependabot
Bot
force-pushed
the
dependabot/nuget/src/WolverineFx-6.34.0
branch
from
September 8, 2026 13:23
d9cc815 to
3f99ce7
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pinned WolverineFx at 6.35.0.
Release notes
Sourced from WolverineFx's releases.
6.35.0
Store operation side effects, everywhere
MartenOpscovered store / insert / update / delete plusStartStream; anything else meant taking anIDocumentSessionand giving up on the handler being a pure function. All three stores now coverwhat their own session API supports.
HardDelete,HardDeleteWhere,UndoDeleteWhereUpdateExpectedVersionUpdateRevisionTryUpdateRevisionPatch,PatchWhereQueueSqlCommandInsertObjects,DeleteObjectsAppend,ArchiveStreamUnArchiveStream,TombstoneStreamThe gaps are deliberate: each set was checked against that store's own session API rather than copied
across, and an op whose
Executecould only throw is worse than the absence of one. Polecat's lastrow is the reverse case — two operations Marten has no counterpart for.
Every op also implements
ITenantedMartenOp/ITenantedPolecatOp/ITenantedFisherOp, so oneextension scopes any of them while preserving the concrete return type:
Thanks to @erdtsieck for the Marten half, which is where this started.
Event Modeling: a declared model and the code now meet
Three findings from one comparison of a curated Event Model against the application built from it
(#4385, #4386, #4387):
behaviour (
ConfirmAppointment) while a derived source names it for the message type or the route.An eleven-slice application assembled as twenty-two with no disagreements — not because the sources
agreed, but because they never met.
[Emits(typeof(...))]lets a handler name the events its signature cannot carry.EventsToAppendand
StartStreamerase the element types, so the more idiomatically event-modelled an applicationwas, the emptier its derived model got.
Patternis left unclaimed for a message handler. A handler cannot tell a Command from anAutomation, so a declaration wins the role instead of losing to a guess.
pattern: "Command"inevent-modeloutput or theServiceCapabilitiessnapshot.Patternis still derived wherever thecode answers the question — HTTP routes, gRPC RPCs, schedules, external systems, and any slice whose
... (truncated)
Commits viewable in compare view.