Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jun 25, 2025. It is now read-only.

Conversation

@0cyn
Copy link
Member

@0cyn 0cyn commented Jan 24, 2023

No description provided.

@0cyn 0cyn self-assigned this Jan 24, 2023
@0cyn 0cyn marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2023 21:16
@0cyn 0cyn requested a review from jonpalmisc January 24, 2023 21:16
@jonpalmisc
Copy link

Before I do a review, I do believe that this should be placed behind a setting so that it can be enabled/disabled as desired.

@plafosse plafosse self-assigned this Jan 25, 2023
@plafosse plafosse self-requested a review January 25, 2023 19:20
Copy link

@jonpalmisc jonpalmisc left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Cursory glance did not reveal any catastrophic mistakes, just minor fixes needed. Not on a computer where I can test this functionally at the moment, however.

Question: What happens when the setting is toggled after initial analysis? My intuition would tell me that functions that end up getting re-analyzed would have the ARC code removed, but old ones wouldn't? Not sure what the "correct" behavior here should be though.

@0cyn
Copy link
Member Author

0cyn commented Jul 18, 2023

This is functional but appears to be partially broken on newer arm64 format binaries which stub code out heavily.

Merge blocked pending addressing Vector35/binaryninja-api#5563

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants