Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: update to supported go versions #157

Open
wants to merge 10 commits into
base: v4
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

chriswk
Copy link
Contributor

@chriswk chriswk commented Nov 30, 2023

Discussion

Having read https://go.dev/doc/devel/release I realised we haven't looked at our build matrix since 1.16 came out, and our go.mod is still pointing to 1.13 which was EoL 2021-02-16.

This PR bumps go.mod to 1.19 (the current oldest supported version) and updates the build matrix to 1.19, 1.20 and 1.21

@chriswk chriswk self-assigned this Nov 30, 2023
github.com/twmb/murmur3 v1.1.5/go.mod h1:Qq/R7NUyOfr65zD+6Q5IHKsJLwP7exErjN6lyyq3OSQ=
gopkg.in/h2non/gock.v1 v1.0.10 h1:D4j796HhgidcxF0LnDyFXcoEbEZWoLEWf0kRh61p22w=
gopkg.in/h2non/gock.v1 v1.0.10/go.mod h1:KHI4Z1sxDW6P4N3DfTWSEza07YpkQP7KJBfglRMEjKY=
github.com/stretchr/objx v0.1.0/go.mod h1:HFkY916IF+rwdDfMAkV7OtwuqBVzrE8GR6GFx+wExME=
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

why do we have explosion of versions here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe that go 1.17 updated the format for go.mod/go.sum, and since we now explicitly state go 1.19 in our go.mod, the new format takes effect.

@gastonfournier gastonfournier enabled auto-merge (squash) August 7, 2024 08:56
@gastonfournier
Copy link
Contributor

With this change we might be dropping support for older versions of go. Maybe something we want to do... I did test the current v4 against newer versions of go and it seems to work well: #177

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: In Progress
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants